Daily Archives: August 29, 2017

CA8: No QI immunity for arrest for obstruction of man video recording arrest of wife from his doorway

Plaintiff awoke to hear a commotion in his front yard, and he saw officers with guns drawn on his handicapped wife. He stood in his doorway and questioned what they were doing and why, and he video recorded them. They … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA8: No QI immunity for arrest for obstruction of man video recording arrest of wife from his doorway

CA10: That search violated CO Const. was not an issue for federal court (on habeas)

Petitioner’s habeas argument that the search of his home violated the Colorado Constitution has nothing to do with a federal conviction where the search complied with the Fourth Amendment. In any event, he already lost on that issue in the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, State constitution | Comments Off on CA10: That search violated CO Const. was not an issue for federal court (on habeas)

OH1: Leaving drug house under surveillance for two weeks was RS

It was reasonable suspicion for defendant to visit a house under surveillance for two weeks as a drug house with detailed collection of information about comings and goings. State v. Donohue, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3668 (1st Dist. Aug. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Leaving drug house under surveillance for two weeks was RS

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Retest of inconclusive UA was reasonable

The military judge erred in suppressing the results of a second “reinspection” UA administered as a base protocol after a first UA after an AWOL come up positive, diluted, or inconclusive. It was a reasonable command imposed requirement. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Military searches, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Retest of inconclusive UA was reasonable

M.D.Tenn.: Laches applies to Rule 41(g) motions for return of property

The doctrine of laches applies to Rule 41(g) motions for return of property. The seizure of defendant’s property was 2003. Aside from other difficulties (like forfeiture), defendant just waited too long. United States v. Kimball, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136952 … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Laches applies to Rule 41(g) motions for return of property

TN: Cell phone warrantless search led to SW for phone; it was all unreasonable, yet harmless from other overwhelming proof

In a homicide case with plenty of other proof of motive, defendants’ cell phones were illegally searched, and then the decision was made by the police to get a warrant. The search was unreasonable. “It was only after the confirmatory … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on TN: Cell phone warrantless search led to SW for phone; it was all unreasonable, yet harmless from other overwhelming proof