CA9: Officer’s call to def’s PO during stop didn’t unreasonably prolong it, and PO requested search

The officer’s call to defendant’s PO during his traffic stop did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The PO separately had reasonable suspicion for a search and requested one. United States v. Seugasala, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14173 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 2017).

Where the first search warrant for defendant’s property was held valid, it wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel to stipulate to the second warrant. And, it was valid anyway. State v. Ralston, 2017-Ohio-7057, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3183 (4th Dist. July 25, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.