Monthly Archives: August 2016

CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

NYPD’s crime scene entry at the scene of a murder and protective sweep were all valid because of the exigency of the entry. Drug and other evidence was in plain view. [There are no facts talking about standing, or whether … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge

The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge since the V.I. Supreme Court has never addressed it. [It’s rationale, however, is likely at odds with Utah v. Strieff which likely was never briefed.] People v. Looby, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 114 … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge

IL: Officer’s entry was consented to and a suspect fled with officer chasing; when he came back he re-entered, and it was treated as part of initial entry

There was a consensual entry into a room, and a suspect fled. The officer gave chase and returned. Under state case law, that was essentially one continuous entry, and the second re-entry didn’t required a separate consent. Defendant, moreover, didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Officer’s entry was consented to and a suspect fled with officer chasing; when he came back he re-entered, and it was treated as part of initial entry

NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

Defendant was arrested based on an outdated warrant. State law prior to Herring likely would have provided relief, but the court is now bound by Herring and concludes that the exclusionary rule would not be applied. Yes, there was delay … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

ID: Interstate bus driver’s opening backpack was private search even though officer was watching

An interstate bus traveling from Portland OR to Salt Lake City stopped in Boise. The bus driver was moving luggage around to straighten it up for the boarding passengers, and he smelled marijuana coming from a backpack. He called the … Continue reading

Posted in Common law, Private search | Comments Off on ID: Interstate bus driver’s opening backpack was private search even though officer was watching

CA2: NYC cab driver didn’t show standing to contest GPS tracking of a taxicab

“Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J.), granting summary judgment to Defendants Appellees, the City of New York and various of its employees, on Plaintiff Appellant Hassan El … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA2: NYC cab driver didn’t show standing to contest GPS tracking of a taxicab

NH: Court can’t force state to search sex case complainant’s cell phone as discovery

In a sex assault case, the trial court did not have the authority to compel the state to search the complainant’s cell phone for voice mails and text messages for the defense as a part of discovery. It’s not the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NH: Court can’t force state to search sex case complainant’s cell phone as discovery

OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º was reasonable suspicion. State v. Hicks, 2016-Ohio-5439, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3341 (2d Dist. Aug. 19, 2016).* Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment tort claims denied in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Odor of marijuana, air fresheners, and window down when it was 25º is RS

CA11: Shooting unarmed man as excessive force is clearly established; summary judgment properly denied

Summary judgment properly denied for a police killing of an unarmed man who had been twice Tazered, the first time with a knife in his kitchen who then ran to his bathroom and was Tazered coming out then shot. The … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting unarmed man as excessive force is clearly established; summary judgment properly denied

CA6: Turning around because of a wrong turn toward Canada doesn’t bar a border search coming back

Plaintiff made a wrong turn heading to summer camp and ended up on a bridge to Canada. He was allowed to turn around without leaving the country, but he could only get into a lane with motorists coming from Canada … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on CA6: Turning around because of a wrong turn toward Canada doesn’t bar a border search coming back

CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

The Seventh Circuit here dealt with a Fourth Amendment IAC claim. The court dealt with the Fourth Amendment merits, which was far easier, rather than get into the complexity of Stone v. Powell deterrence issue under a § 2254 claim. … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA7: Inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to DNA blood draw [via a habeas appeal]

W.D.Mo.: Def running around naked on street on PCP and kids in house justified emergency

Defendant was raving and running around naked on PCP “and was exhibiting bizarre and erratic behavior” and his front door was left open. There were children in the house, and the police were permitted under the emergency aid exception to … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def running around naked on street on PCP and kids in house justified emergency

OH9: Dog sniff during normal incidents of traffic stop not unreasonable

A dog sniff during the normal incidents of a traffic stop isn’t unreasonable. An arrest outside of an officer’s jurisdiction in violation of statute also thus violates the state constitution but not the Fourth Amendment. State v. Duran, 2016-Ohio-5459, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff | Comments Off on OH9: Dog sniff during normal incidents of traffic stop not unreasonable

DE: Admitting violation of probation is a waiver of suppression issue

Admitting to the violation of probation is a waiver of any suppression issue. Thompson v. State, 2016 Del. LEXIS 441 (Aug. 19, 2016). The fact that defendant matched the description of a suspicious person reported to the police, was in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Admitting violation of probation is a waiver of suppression issue

The Atlantic: All the Ways Your Wi-Fi Router Can Spy on You

The Atlantic: All the Ways Your Wi-Fi Router Can Spy on You by Kevah Waddell: It can even be trained to read your lips.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on The Atlantic: All the Ways Your Wi-Fi Router Can Spy on You

Bloomberg Businessweek: Secret Cameras Record Baltimore’s Every Move From Above

Bloomberg Businessweek: Secret Cameras Record Baltimore’s Every Move From Above by Monte Reel: Since January, police have been testing an aerial surveillance system adapted from the surge in Iraq. And they neglected to tell the public.

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Bloomberg Businessweek: Secret Cameras Record Baltimore’s Every Move From Above

PA: SW affidavits not yet revealed to def; investigation could be compromised

Reviewing the affidavits for the three search warrants, the court is convinced that there is still a risk of compromising the investigation, so the search warrants will remain under seal as to the potential defendant. The court recognizes the right … Continue reading

Posted in Common law, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: SW affidavits not yet revealed to def; investigation could be compromised

FISCR: Capturing some call content isn’t unreasonable if it can’t [maybe won’t] be used

Incidental capturing of content information during use of a pen register is not unreasonable. The technology only allows for capture some, and it can’t be used without a separate order based on probable cause. In re: Certified Question of Law, … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on FISCR: Capturing some call content isn’t unreasonable if it can’t [maybe won’t] be used

Cal: Subsequent motions to suppress have to be heard by same judge unless unavailable

California statute that requires same judge hear a subsequent motion to suppress is designed to prevent forum shopping, and it must be complied with unless the same judge is unavailable or just can’t hear the motion. People v. Rodriguez, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cal: Subsequent motions to suppress have to be heard by same judge unless unavailable

CA11: Writ for body attachment for unpaid child support supports search incident

“This appeal presents a question of first impression about the Fourth Amendment: Can the police arrest someone based solely on a civil writ of bodily attachment for unpaid child support? Ted Phillips appeals his conviction of being a felon in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Writ for body attachment for unpaid child support supports search incident