Monthly Archives: September 2015

D.Kan.: “What is a high crime area?” is nebulous

On the totality, the officers had reasonable suspicion. Breaking them down, however, some were afforded less weight, such as “what is a high crime area?” Here, the reasonable suspicion ripened into probable cause and permitted a search incident. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “What is a high crime area?” is nebulous

TN: Failure to prove def’s nexus to target property made search without PC

The state failed to prove nexus to this property for the search warrant. There was probable cause to search the property of defendant, but what was lacking was his connection to this property. “It provided more than sufficient probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Search incident | Comments Off on TN: Failure to prove def’s nexus to target property made search without PC

D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter. United States v. Pinex, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118558 (D.Mont. September 4, 2015). Packages in the mail … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

DE: When collective knowledge is used, the first with PC or RS must be called at suppression hearing; hearsay not admissible

When the state relies on the collective knowledge doctrine, it is required to call the officers involved in both ends of it. Merely having the searching officer testify to hearsay as to what the first officer did is inadequate, even … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on DE: When collective knowledge is used, the first with PC or RS must be called at suppression hearing; hearsay not admissible

N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

Defendant consented to search of his cell phone. Proof of knowledge of rights comes from the fact he earlier gave a limited consent to search other property. United States v. Thurman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117893 (N.D. Ill. September 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses. It is a reasonable suspicion warranting a patdown. “Such a risk was only heightened here because the ‘traffic violation’ at issue—using forged or stolen … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

D.Nev.: Rule 17 subpoena couldn’t be used for discovery for suppression hearing where nothing in particular was sought

Defendant’s Rule 17 subpoena for personnel files to the city police involved in a stop and search on an Amtrak train was quashed. There was no showing that it would produce evidence of any value at this point in the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Rule 17 subpoena couldn’t be used for discovery for suppression hearing where nothing in particular was sought

E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

“Yet, as illustrated above, the record does not contain sufficient information from which the Court can find that a suppression motion would have been meritless. As a result, the Court concludes that an evidentiary hearing is required on this claim. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

It was not clearly established in 2009 that use of a Taser was unreasonable so the officers get qualified immunity. Here, it happened in jail when plaintiff refused to change into a jail uniform. Hollingsworth v. City of St. Ann, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

N.D.Cal.: Warrant for seizure of pictures of def precluded seizure of pictures of others

The search warrant here authorized seizure of photographs that depicted defendant, but photos of others were seized, and they are suppressed for being outside the warrant. United States v. Williams, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117274 (N.D.Cal. September 1, 2015). Plainclothes … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Warrant for seizure of pictures of def precluded seizure of pictures of others

Fusion: Tech companies may be our best hope for resisting government surveillance

Fusion: Tech companies may be our best hope for resisting government surveillance by Ryan Calo:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fusion: Tech companies may be our best hope for resisting government surveillance

W.D.Pa.: Long term pole camera surveillance of front of house valid

Suppression of long term pole camera surveillance of defendant’s front door almost summarily denied. United States v. Gilliam, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118511 (W.D.Pa. September 4, 2015):

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Long term pole camera surveillance of front of house valid

D.Nev.: When a Mexican national was stopped, the time for a call to EPIC could be included in the reasonable length of stop

A call to the El Paso Intelligence Center about defendant who produced a Mexican passport was reasonably included in the length of the stop. Defendant was noticeably nervous, gave conflicting travel plans, and the license plate did not match the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: When a Mexican national was stopped, the time for a call to EPIC could be included in the reasonable length of stop

OH1: A car listed on the search warrant could be searched away from the premises

“[*P7] Following the issuance of the warrant, RENU agents conducted surveillance on the residence at 3021 Cavanaugh Avenue. According to Deputy Kane, RENU agents would generally wait to execute a search warrant until an occupant left the targeted residence, especially … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: A car listed on the search warrant could be searched away from the premises

S.D.Ohio: A series of furtive gestures was reasonable suspicion and permitted defendant’s patdown

A series of furtive gestures was reasonable suspicion and permitted defendant’s patdown. United States v. Pacheco, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117786 (S.D.Ohio September 3, 2015)*:

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: A series of furtive gestures was reasonable suspicion and permitted defendant’s patdown

W.D.N.Y.: There’s no standing in a dilapidated building def occupies knowing it was de facto condemned

Defendant put a mattress in a dilapidated building that he knew the city wanted unoccupied because it was unsafe. Therefore, the court concludes he has no standing. United States v. Rounds, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117174 (W.D.N.Y. September 2, 2015):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: There’s no standing in a dilapidated building def occupies knowing it was de facto condemned

AZ: A probation or parole search must be reasonable under the totality of circumstances; reasonable suspicion not required

A probation or parole search must be reasonable under the totality of circumstances, and the trial court erred in requiring reasonable suspicion. State v. Adair, 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 179 (September 3, 2015):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AZ: A probation or parole search must be reasonable under the totality of circumstances; reasonable suspicion not required

TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

While the Texas standard of consent is clear and convincing evidence, “even a finding of ‘“[m]ere acquiescence” may constitute a finding of consent.’ Meekins, 340 S.W.3d at 463-64.” [apparently even though SCOTUS says no]. Hutchins v. State, 2015 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

M.D.Pa.: It is a reasonable inference that drug dealers keep their stashes at home

It is a reasonable inference that drug dealers keep their stashes at home, and that supports a search warrant of their home. United States v. Kelly, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117523 (M.D.Pa. September 3, 2015):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: It is a reasonable inference that drug dealers keep their stashes at home

MD: DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident for the cause of intoxication

A DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident of the interior of the vehicle for whatever made defendant intoxicated under Gant. “Although we may not be able reconcile these divergent holdings, it is clear that (1) an officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on MD: DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident for the cause of intoxication