Monthly Archives: November 2014

CA5: Since court upheld warrantless GPS before Jones, no 2255 relief

The Fifth Circuit upheld GPS tracking without a warrant prior to Jones, so defendant wasn’t entitled to 2255 relief under Davis good faith. (The government also argued that Stone v. Powell applied, which would be true, but the court didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Since court upheld warrantless GPS before Jones, no 2255 relief

OR follows Brown v. Illinois on attenuation

Oregon follows Brown v. Illinois on attenuation analysis. State v. Bailey, 356 Ore. 486, 2014 Ore. LEXIS 813 (November 6, 2014):

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on OR follows Brown v. Illinois on attenuation

E.D.Pa.: 1 am robbery report by three men was enough to stop first three men seen in vicinity

The stopping officer had a radio report of a recent robbery at 12:54 a.m. by three black males, with no further description. In the vicinity of the robbery, a high crime area, the officer encountered three men about 1 a.m. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: 1 am robbery report by three men was enough to stop first three men seen in vicinity

Slate: Stingrays: Not Just for Feds!

Slate: Stingrays: Not Just for Feds! by Kate Klonick: How local law enforcement uses an invasive, unreliable surveillance tool. From Ferguson to Senate hearings, the news of local police arming themselves with federal-grade equipment—tanks, riot gear, M16 rifles—has captivated everyone … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Slate: Stingrays: Not Just for Feds!

WaPo: Unusual lawsuit challenges police seizure tactics

WaPo: Unusual lawsuit challenges police seizure tactics by Robert O’Harrow Jr.: The two men in the rented red Nissan Altima were poker players traveling through Iowa on their way to Las Vegas. The police were state troopers on the hunt … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: Unusual lawsuit challenges police seizure tactics

MYTimes: Concerns in Criminal Justice System as New York City Eases Marijuana Policy

MYTimes: Concerns in Criminal Justice System as New York City Eases Marijuana Policy by Al Baker: Mayor Bill de Blasio, who took office promising to reform the Police Department and repair relations with black and Latino communities, on Monday unveiled … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MYTimes: Concerns in Criminal Justice System as New York City Eases Marijuana Policy

WSJ: Lynch: Civil Actions Against Police Agencies Can Spur ‘Systemic Change’

Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Lynch: Civil Actions Against Police Agencies Can Spur ‘Systemic Change’ by Jacob Gershman: How would President Barack Obama’s Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch approach a high-profile police controversy like the one that engulfed Ferguson, Mo., … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WSJ: Lynch: Civil Actions Against Police Agencies Can Spur ‘Systemic Change’

Govt Tech: Eyeglass-Mounted Video Cameras Earn Police Respect

Government Technology: Eyeglass-Mounted Video Cameras Earn Police Respect by Dean Narciso, Columbus Dispatch: If not for Sunbury, Ohio, officers’ new cameras, one case might have brought charges of police abuse, Fourth Amendment violations and a lengthy investigation. The officers raced … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Govt Tech: Eyeglass-Mounted Video Cameras Earn Police Respect

FL4: Missing a school bus doesn’t make student a truant subject to frisk

A pat frisk of a student as an alleged truant who missed a school bus an hour before the start of school was invalid because he wasn’t yet a truant. Even so, what’s the basis for a frisk for truancy. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Missing a school bus doesn’t make student a truant subject to frisk

NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City

NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City by Joseph Goldstein: The New York Police Department, which has been arresting tens of thousands of people a year for low-level marijuana possession, is poised to stop making such … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City

SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

Officers didn’t go to the front door for a knock-and-announce and they didn’t anybody. The law was not clearly established at the time. The homeowner sued under § 1983. SCOTUS per curiam grants the officers qualified immunity without full briefing. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

FISC: Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released

Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released (without adversarial briefing, of course). In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Production of Tangible Things from [Redacted], 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157864 (For. Intel. Surv. … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on FISC: Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released

DC’s new MJ decriminalization doesn’t affect a search from 2010

Decriminalization of marijuana in the future may change the probable cause calculus, but this search was based on the smell of marijuana and long predated that (April 2010). Butler v. United States, 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 446 (November 6, 2014) … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on DC’s new MJ decriminalization doesn’t affect a search from 2010

IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’s implied-consent statutory scheme did not unconstitutionally circumvent defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to take the chemical analysis by suspending his driver’s license and introducing his refusal against him at his criminal trial. A per se … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

D.Nev.: Touching the fog line when a police car is in one’s blind spot isn’t a traffic offense; stop unreasonable

Defendant touched the fog line and wasn’t driving erratically. As he explained on the video during the stop, he was concerned that there was a police car staying in his blind spot and he was trying to stay away from … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Touching the fog line when a police car is in one’s blind spot isn’t a traffic offense; stop unreasonable

D.Kan.: RS was shown for a frisk even though the officer didn’t articulate it

A frisk was reasonable where the officer would have to turn his back on the defendant to deal with the passenger, even though the officer did not articulate specific reasonable suspicion he was armed. “As in Manjarrez, the deputy could … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: RS was shown for a frisk even though the officer didn’t articulate it

W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

Defendant’s cell phone found in a car searched under the automobile exception could be seized pending getting a search warrant for it. There was probable cause to believe evidence of the crime would be found there. United States v. Palermo, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

N.D.Cal.: Officers’ testimony too embellished and padded to be believable

The court finds the officers’ testimony too embellished and padded to be believable. Their job is to testify factually and not embellish. [See Treatise § 60.47 n.2 (“Counsel should watch for testimony ‘tailored to nullify constitutional objections.’”)] United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Officers’ testimony too embellished and padded to be believable

N.D.Cal.: 404(b) and the exclusionary rule

N.D.Cal. wrestles with 404(b) and the exclusionary rule. United States v. Felix, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156232 (N.D. Cal. October 31, 2014). See Treatise § 9.02. A thoughtful opinion, without really resolving the issue, yet:

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 404(b) and the exclusionary rule

CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important

The affidavit for the search warrant showed probable cause, so the search can’t be suppressed. Moreover, the officer acted reasonably and gets qualified immunity. The search itself wasn’t as broad as the warrant was argued to allow, so the search … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important