Daily Archives: November 10, 2014

NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City

NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City by Joseph Goldstein: The New York Police Department, which has been arresting tens of thousands of people a year for low-level marijuana possession, is poised to stop making such … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYTimes: Marijuana May Mean Ticket, Not Arrest, in New York City

SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

Officers didn’t go to the front door for a knock-and-announce and they didn’t anybody. The law was not clearly established at the time. The homeowner sued under § 1983. SCOTUS per curiam grants the officers qualified immunity without full briefing. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

FISC: Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released

Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released (without adversarial briefing, of course). In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring the Production of Tangible Things from [Redacted], 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157864 (For. Intel. Surv. … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on FISC: Another FISC case disagreeing with Klayman released

DC’s new MJ decriminalization doesn’t affect a search from 2010

Decriminalization of marijuana in the future may change the probable cause calculus, but this search was based on the smell of marijuana and long predated that (April 2010). Butler v. United States, 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 446 (November 6, 2014) … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on DC’s new MJ decriminalization doesn’t affect a search from 2010

IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’s implied-consent statutory scheme did not unconstitutionally circumvent defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to take the chemical analysis by suspending his driver’s license and introducing his refusal against him at his criminal trial. A per se … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

D.Nev.: Touching the fog line when a police car is in one’s blind spot isn’t a traffic offense; stop unreasonable

Defendant touched the fog line and wasn’t driving erratically. As he explained on the video during the stop, he was concerned that there was a police car staying in his blind spot and he was trying to stay away from … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Touching the fog line when a police car is in one’s blind spot isn’t a traffic offense; stop unreasonable

D.Kan.: RS was shown for a frisk even though the officer didn’t articulate it

A frisk was reasonable where the officer would have to turn his back on the defendant to deal with the passenger, even though the officer did not articulate specific reasonable suspicion he was armed. “As in Manjarrez, the deputy could … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: RS was shown for a frisk even though the officer didn’t articulate it

W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW

Defendant’s cell phone found in a car searched under the automobile exception could be seized pending getting a search warrant for it. There was probable cause to believe evidence of the crime would be found there. United States v. Palermo, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Cell phone found in automobile exception search could be seized for SW