Daily Archives: November 5, 2014

Lawfare: Recap of Yesterday’s Argument in the Section 215 Case

Lawfare: Recap of Yesterday’s Argument in the Section 215 Case by Wells Bennett: Below you’ll find a recap of yesterday morning’s argument in Klayman v. Obama. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit yesterday considered a key challenge to the … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Lawfare: Recap of Yesterday’s Argument in the Section 215 Case

CA3: Failure to include attachment when SW served didn’t make it overbroad

The failure to serve an attachment with the search warrant is not fatal despite it providing particularity. It was presented to the USMJ, and the officer’s conduct was otherwise objectively reasonable. The question of good faith does not even have … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Failure to include attachment when SW served didn’t make it overbroad

E.D.Wis.: No consent; situation was police dominated and with directives, not asking

Defendant merely submitted to a claim of authority to search; it could not be found to be by consent. The situation was completely police dominated, and nothing was asked–it was directed. United States v. Ivory, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155784 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No consent; situation was police dominated and with directives, not asking

Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash

Nexus to defendant’s house for a drug search warrant was established by his leaving his house to do drug deals then coming right home. It’s common for drug dealers to keep their stash at home. State v. Hogan, 2014 Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash