Daily Archives: November 28, 2014

Politico: The Great Police Violence Cover-Up

Politico: The Great Police Violence Cover-Up by Michael Hirsh It’s a federal law, but most departments refuse to divulge data on cop shootings.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Politico: The Great Police Violence Cover-Up

CA8: If male owner of vehicle has suspended DL, officer isn’t required to ID driver’s gender before stop

The officer here ran an LPN check and determined that the owner of the vehicle, a man, had a suspended DL. A woman was driving, but the officer could see that from the rear. “Given the road and weather conditions, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: If male owner of vehicle has suspended DL, officer isn’t required to ID driver’s gender before stop

Cal.1st: McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception

The McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception. People v. Jones, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1083 (1st Dist. November 26, 2014): Prior to McNeely, all binding judicial precedent in this state, both at the Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.1st: McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception

D.Me.: A private searcher’s fervent desire to help the police is still a private search

A computer tech working on a computer saw “pictures of pre-teen girls in gymnast uniforms,” so he searched the search history and found searches for non-nude preteens and “pre-teen porn.” He reported it to the local police who did not … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Private search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Me.: A private searcher’s fervent desire to help the police is still a private search

D.N.M.: Police procedure expert on excessive force won’t get to testify to “nationally accepted police procedures”

In a federal criminal indictment for excessive force, the government’s use of an expert witness on “nationally accepted police procedures” on excessive force was not admissible because a violation of those undefined standards is not a violation of the constitution. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Police procedure expert on excessive force won’t get to testify to “nationally accepted police procedures”