Category Archives: Attenuation

S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep of small apt loft was valid

A protective sweep of even a small apartment’s loft and closet is valid. Plain view sustained. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206238 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 6, 2018).* The search issue is not dispositive of the case because … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep of small apt loft was valid

CA4: Unlawfully placing GPS on def’s car was flagrant 4A violation; no attenuation found

The government unlawfully placed a GPS device on defendant’s car and two days later stopped him. It argued in the district court a lack of standing, which prevailed there, and then conceded they were wrong on appeal. The constitutional violation … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA4: Unlawfully placing GPS on def’s car was flagrant 4A violation; no attenuation found

IN recognizes attenuation doctrine under state constitution’s exclusionary rule.

Indiana recognizes attenuation doctrine under state constitution’s exclusionary rule. Wright v. State, 2018 Ind. LEXIS 565 (Oct. 4, 2018):

Posted in Attenuation, State constitution | Comments Off on IN recognizes attenuation doctrine under state constitution’s exclusionary rule.

S.D.Cal.: Cell phone was validly searched under border search exception; obtaining passcode was likely unlawful, but government isn’t going to use it

Defendant was arrested at Calexico for importing meth. While in the holding cell, she gave up the password for the cell phone. The government isn’t going to use her revealing the password as evidence, but it wants to use the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Cell phone was validly searched under border search exception; obtaining passcode was likely unlawful, but government isn’t going to use it

MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

Defendant was arguably subjected to an invalid stop and frisk, but his flight was an intervening circumstance supporting finding the gun. Thornton v. State, 2018 Md. App. LEXIS 716 (July 25, 2018). “The testimony at the suppression hearing demonstrated that … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on MD: Stop-and-frisk might have been invalid, but def fled and that made it valid

S.D.Ga.: CI information was a little stale, but the officer’s corroroboration was with current information and that overcame staleness

The CI’s information was a little dated and potentially stale, but it was corroborated by current information and that was probable cause. United States v. Mobley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101640 (S.D. Ga. June 18, 2018). “In this case, by … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Informant hearsay, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: CI information was a little stale, but the officer’s corroroboration was with current information and that overcame staleness

E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates

Plaintiff prison inmate states a claim for a digital search in front of other inmates. Fuentes v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52132 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018). The prison strip search here had a legitimate penological … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Body searches, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates

CA5: Attenuation of statement from arrest found: “Suppression of inculpatory evidence is an extraordinary remedy.”

The Fifth Circuit finds defendant’s statement is attenuated from his arrest. The time factor favors defendant but the rest favors the government. “Finally, the purpose and flagrancy factor favors the Government with respect to both the stop and subsequent search. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on CA5: Attenuation of statement from arrest found: “Suppression of inculpatory evidence is an extraordinary remedy.”

E.D.N.C.: Mere disagreement with state court conclusion on 4A claim doesn’t overcome Stone v. Powell bar

Defendant litigated his search in state court and lost in the trial court and on appeal. He filed a habeas petition. “Petitioner’s disagreement with the ultimate disposition of his Fourth Amendment claim does not indicate he was not given a … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Mere disagreement with state court conclusion on 4A claim doesn’t overcome Stone v. Powell bar

CA10: Consent was attenuated from alleged unlawful stop despite def’s real urgency to go pee

The government proved that defendant’s consent was attentuated from the alleged unlawful detention because the paperwork during the stop was given back. The district court considered the fact defendant complained she had to pee really bad. United States v. Ramos, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on CA10: Consent was attenuated from alleged unlawful stop despite def’s real urgency to go pee

NM: Assuming stop was unconstitutional, def’s giving a false name purged the taint

Surveying the law nationwide, the court concludes that defendant’s giving a false name purged the taint of his unreasonable stop under both the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. The court declines the invitation to distinguish between violent and non-violent … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on NM: Assuming stop was unconstitutional, def’s giving a false name purged the taint

IN: FBI’s search was used in state court; since state doesn’t recognize attenuation, the uncontested suppression of the search also suppresses def’s statements

The FBI’s search of defendant’s computers was governed by the Indiana Constitution in state court, and the search was unlawful under that. Since Indiana doesn’t recognize the attenuation doctrine, defendant’s statements are suppressed as well. Wright v. State, 2018 Ind. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: FBI’s search was used in state court; since state doesn’t recognize attenuation, the uncontested suppression of the search also suppresses def’s statements

IL: Illegal stop and search not fixed under Strieff by finding outstanding warrant after

An illegal stop and search that led to an outstanding warrant wasn’t attenuated by the finding of the warrant, even when the stop was not purposeful or flagrant. In re Jarrell C. (People v. Jarrell C.), 2017 IL App (1st) … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on IL: Illegal stop and search not fixed under Strieff by finding outstanding warrant after

CA8: The independent source rule doesn’t apply to a civil rights conviction for false arrest

Defendant was properly convicted of false arrest as a deprivation of civil rights. He argued the attenuation doctrine that there was an independent source of information. There wasn’t, and the independent source doctrine is for the exclusionary rule not a … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Independent source | Comments Off on CA8: The independent source rule doesn’t apply to a civil rights conviction for false arrest

OR: State has burden of pleading and proof on attenuation, and here it failed

The state had the burden and failed to prove attenuation between the stop and unreasonable search and finding the evidence. It did not raise the issue to preserve it. [This was submitted 33 months ago after remand from Oregon Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof | Comments Off on OR: State has burden of pleading and proof on attenuation, and here it failed

MD follows Strieff on attenuation from preexisting arrest warrant

“[W]here officers observed a group of individuals openly drinking what appeared to be an alcoholic beverage and one of them threw a bottle to the ground, the officers had reasonable suspicion to investigate a potential open container violation and to … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD follows Strieff on attenuation from preexisting arrest warrant

NE: Oral and written advice of rights to refuse consent attenuated any possible minor illegal police misconduct

The officer’s misconduct, if any, wasn’t flagrant and the later written advisement and waiver of consent was attenuation. State v. Bray, 297 Neb. 916, 2017 Neb. LEXIS 178 (Sept. 29, 2017). Defendant was driving a car carrier, and he was … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on NE: Oral and written advice of rights to refuse consent attenuated any possible minor illegal police misconduct

M.D.La.: Def claims an illegal search led to his arrest; his admissions on jail phone calls are attenuated from that

Defendant’s calls from jail to his girlfriend about destroying evidence were attenuated from any prior illegality. “The Court finds that the nexus between the original unlawful search and the challenged evidence was attenuated by the intervening phone calls, an independent … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Def claims an illegal search led to his arrest; his admissions on jail phone calls are attenuated from that

OH5: SW needed to obtain blood results from hospital’s blood draw

Defendant’s blood draw in the hospital was for medical purposes, and a search warrant was required to get access to that information. Trial court affirmed. State v. Saunders, 2017-Ohio-7348, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3640 (5th Dist. Aug. 23, 2017). Playpen … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH5: SW needed to obtain blood results from hospital’s blood draw

ID: Distinguishing Strieff, when it was obvious the person stopped was not the person the police were looking for, running warrants was unnecessary and continued the stop

Distinguishing Strieff, when it was obvious the person stopped was not the person the police were looking for, running warrants on them was unnecessary and continued the stop. State v. Cohagan, 2017 Ida. LEXIS 250 (Aug. 24, 2017)

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on ID: Distinguishing Strieff, when it was obvious the person stopped was not the person the police were looking for, running warrants was unnecessary and continued the stop