Category Archives: Particularity

DE: Cut-and-paste SW led to overbreadth problem in witness tampering SW where child porn found and suppressed

This is a child pornography case. The search warrant was a cut-and-paste from a child porn warrant but the warrant was for evidence of witness tampering on a computer. Child porn was found. The result was a warrant that failed … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on DE: Cut-and-paste SW led to overbreadth problem in witness tampering SW where child porn found and suppressed

OH3: Particularity challenge waived by not presenting it to suppression court

The officer’s smelling marijuana outside defendant’s residence was probable cause to corroborate the story that defendant had a grow going on. A particularity challenge was waived by not presenting it to the trial court at the suppression hearing. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Particularity challenge waived by not presenting it to suppression court

CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones

“The warrant, as written, defines ‘computer hardware’ broadly. Horton does not and cannot argue that his cell phone is not ‘computer hardware’ as it is defined in the warrant, which includes ‘any equipment’ (emphasis added) capable of transmitting computer data. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones

D.Minn.: “other media” showing “address, vehicle, and location of narcotics proceeds” permitted seizure of cell phone

The search warrant authorized seizure of “other media that show standing for an address, vehicle, the location of narcotics proceeds, or a connection between people, addresses and vehicles or that a crime has been committed” and that permitted seizure of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “other media” showing “address, vehicle, and location of narcotics proceeds” permitted seizure of cell phone

CA6: SW for person by alias and description was valid when he was under surveillance from issuance to execution

Warrants are usually directed at places and things not people, but here was a search warrant directed at defendant by his known alias and description. From the time it was issued until it was executed, defendant was under surveillance. It … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA6: SW for person by alias and description was valid when he was under surveillance from issuance to execution

S.D.W.Va.: Heroin and other drug warrant was not overbroad despite boilerplate language

A search warrant for heroin that was otherwise boilerplate as to other controlled substances and all the things that officers always want to look for in drug cases was not overbroad. And good faith still applies. United States v. McCarrall, … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Heroin and other drug warrant was not overbroad despite boilerplate language

CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

In this § 1983 case over the particularity of a search warrant over stolen cars on his property, the officers had qualified immunity. The warrant was not so lacking in particularity that a reasonable officer couldn’t rely on it. Rathbun … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity | Comments Off on CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

D.S.D.: A black nylon bag found outside def’s curtilage could be seized and searched

Officers came to defendant’s house to serve an arrest warrant, but nobody was home. Walking back to the street, the officers saw a black nylon bag laying just beyond railroad ties in the yard between the house and nearer the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Curtilage, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.D.: A black nylon bag found outside def’s curtilage could be seized and searched

CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

Individually, none of the factors of reasonable suspicion was enough, but collectively they were. “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

Officers do not need reasonable suspicion to conduct a knock-and-talk. Defendant’s consent to enter wasn’t involuntary because he thought he couldn’t refuse because he was on probation. State v. Fretheim, 2015 UT App 197, 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 206 (August … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

N.D.Ga.: Govt’s email search protocol satisfied particularity despite large initial seizure

The government’s protocol for searching defendant’s emails satisfied the particularity requirement. All the emails were produced, but the government searched within them only for emails relating to copyright infringement, the crime under investigation. Other cases are in accord. United States … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Govt’s email search protocol satisfied particularity despite large initial seizure

New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

Adam M. Gershowitz, The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-313. Abstract: Last year, in Riley v. California, the Supreme Court required police to procure a warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

GA: Mistake in address not prejudicial where right place was searched; police used address listed with Assessor

The search warrant had a mistaken address. It authorized the search of the plaintiff’s building but listed it as 11195 when it was actually 11193. The wrong building was not searched. Plaintiff did not state a claim for trespass by … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Mistake in address not prejudicial where right place was searched; police used address listed with Assessor

WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data”

WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data” by Orin Kerr: I recently posted a new draft article, “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data.” The … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data”

LA: Probationer in the house of another probationer during a PO home visit was searched with RS

Defendant was a probationer in the house of another probationer when the other probationer was subjected to a home visit. After finding marijuana in the bedroom, the officers conducted a protective search of defendant and found drugs. The search was … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA: Probationer in the house of another probationer during a PO home visit was searched with RS

E.D.N.Y.: Overseizure of emails did not void the search warrant; some overseizure necessary for a proper investigation

A judge in the E.D.N.Y. may issue a search warrant for emails on Yahoo!’s email server in California under Rule 41 and the Stored Communications Act. The warrant was broad in its particularity, but still constitutional. The warrant lawfully included … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Overseizure of emails did not void the search warrant; some overseizure necessary for a proper investigation

TN: An RV parked off the property but connected by an electrical cord to the house was subject to search under a warrant for the house

To search vehicles under a search warrant for real property, the vehicles must belong to a person named in the warrant to identify the place or things to be searched. Vehicles belonging to visitors are not subject to search under … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: An RV parked off the property but connected by an electrical cord to the house was subject to search under a warrant for the house

DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that defendant wasn’t named in the search warrant for his specifically described property. [Remember, search warrants are usually for specifically ID’d places, and naming the owner is almost never necessary. If the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

PA: Things “in regards to alleged sexual misconduct with a fourteen year old female” particular enough for a cell phone SW

“Contrary to Dougalewicz’s assertion, the Search Warrants sufficiently identified and limited the items to be searched and seized as text messages, phone calls and picture mail from and to the Verizon and Sprint phones, ‘in regards to alleged sexual misconduct … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on PA: Things “in regards to alleged sexual misconduct with a fourteen year old female” particular enough for a cell phone SW

E.D.Ark.: Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable

Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable. Also, the alleged overseizure of records was not clearly unreasonable. Mountain Pure LLC v. Roberts, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable