OH3: Particularity challenge waived by not presenting it to suppression court

The officer’s smelling marijuana outside defendant’s residence was probable cause to corroborate the story that defendant had a grow going on. A particularity challenge was waived by not presenting it to the trial court at the suppression hearing. State v. Navarro, 2016-Ohio-749, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 669 (3d Dist. Feb. 29, 2016).

The officer had reason to believe that defendant’s license had been suspended for six years, so he had reasonable suspicion that defendant’s license was suspended when defendant was seen on the street. The following inventory of his vehicle was proper. United States v. Sandford, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25140 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion defendant’s Mercedes was involved in a robbery when it was parked outside a store for a long time and, after the robbery, it fled. United States v. Howard, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24536 (E.D.Wis. Feb. 26, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.