Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

MD: Search of defendant’s car can’t be justified as a parole search when the officer was unaware of parole status at the time

The search of defendant’s car can’t be justified as a parole search when the officer was unaware of parole status at the time of the search. State v. Donaldson, 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 3 (January 28, 2015): None of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MD: Search of defendant’s car can’t be justified as a parole search when the officer was unaware of parole status at the time

N.D.Cal.: Def’s admission he lived in place he was found justified parole search of place

All things considered, defendant consented to a search of the house. The fact the consent form was signed after the entry is of minimal value and couldn’t cure an illegal entry anyway. The search is also justified as a parole … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s admission he lived in place he was found justified parole search of place

CA4: Use of a drug dog for a walk-through of a house of one on supervised release violates Fourth Amendment

The use of a drug dog for a walk-through of a house of one on supervised release is suppressed, and it was contrary to precedent, so no good faith exception. United States v. Hill, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 499 (4th … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Use of a drug dog for a walk-through of a house of one on supervised release violates Fourth Amendment

CA10: Govt used Doppler radar to determine if defendant was in house, but court doesn’t have to decide constitutional question

Defendant was wanted for not reporting to probation, and there was a warrant for his arrest. The government used Doppler radar to determine whether defendant was in his house at the time. The court has concerns about the use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CA10: Govt used Doppler radar to determine if defendant was in house, but court doesn’t have to decide constitutional question

D.Alaska: Incomplete tape recording of SW application doesn’t warrant suppression

The tape recording of the officer’s testimony supporting the issuance of the search warrant by a state court judge was incomplete. Nevertheless, there is no constitutional violation because what there is supports the warrant. Compliance with state law on this … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Incomplete tape recording of SW application doesn’t warrant suppression

M.D.Ga.: Def’s probation search of gun safe was with RS of drugs, even if door had to be peeled

Officers had reasonable suspicion for a probation search of defendant’s house, and that included his gun safe. They could have peeled the door but didn’t, and defendant’s giving the combination was essentially moot because the officers could have broken in. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Def’s probation search of gun safe was with RS of drugs, even if door had to be peeled

OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

Police and a probation officer entered defendant’s premises because his housemate was on probation. A padlocked bedroom could not be searched because there was no reason to believe it was the probationer’s. One officer testified to hearing noises inside, another … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

M.D.Pa.: Warrantless PO’s search of cell phone with reasonable suspicion was reasonable

Warrantless search of a sex offense probationer’s cell phone by state PO on reasonable suspicion he was arranging a liaison with a 15 year old was reasonable under Riley and Knights read together. United States v. Dahl, 2014 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Warrantless PO’s search of cell phone with reasonable suspicion was reasonable

DE: No RS for this probation search based on unverified tip

Delaware requires that there be reasonable suspicion for a probation search. Here, a police officer passed on an unverified tip from an informant that defendant was selling drugs, and that was used for a home visit. Defendant had a couple … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: No RS for this probation search based on unverified tip

OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

By living with a probationer, one’s reasonable expectation of privacy is not completely lost and the entire house is not open to a probation search. The probationer can only consent to search of common areas. Here, the probationer let the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

CA6: A parole search can occur in the place the officers have probable cause to believe the defendant is living, even if that’s not the place she’s officially paroled to

A parole search can occur in the place the officers have probable cause to believe the defendant is living, even if that’s not the place she’s officially paroled to. Ohio statute says the place where the parolee lives. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: A parole search can occur in the place the officers have probable cause to believe the defendant is living, even if that’s not the place she’s officially paroled to

CA7: Suspicionless supervised release search condition not justified here

A suspicionless supervised release search condition was not properly justified by the district court, and it’s reversed. United States v. Hinds, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20651 (7th Cir. October 27, 2014): The search and seizure condition, special condition five, can … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: Suspicionless supervised release search condition not justified here

W.D.La.: “Home visits” means searches, but defendant consented anyway

While the term of probation said “home visits,” the PO testified that she told all her charges that “visits” meant searches, so defendant was well aware. Aside from the probation search, defendant was specifically asked for consent, and he gave … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.La.: “Home visits” means searches, but defendant consented anyway

VT: Suspicionless parole searches for internet access and computer use of a SO was reasonable

Probation and parole services did not need reasonable suspicion to conduct home searches of a convicted sex offender for internet access. When released, he agreed to suspicionless searches. There is a state law prohibition on arbitrary or harassing searches, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on VT: Suspicionless parole searches for internet access and computer use of a SO was reasonable

GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

A lost original affidavit for a search warrant can still be proved by testimony that the warrant was otherwise validly issued. Thus, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it on appeal where the record was made on the lost … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search. State v. Sacco, 2014 Iowa App. LEXIS 945 (October 1, 2014): The State asserts the legality of the search at issue here is “controlled by Griffin.” In regard only to Sacco’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

OK: Cell phone search warrant based on prior invalid consent search suppressed; no GFE

The pre-Riley search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was based on an invalid consent search, and the good faith exception does not apply to warrants based on a prior illegal search. State v. Thomas, 2014 OK CR 12, 2014 Okla. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OK: Cell phone search warrant based on prior invalid consent search suppressed; no GFE

E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

Defendant’s failure to answer his door promptly was reasonable cause for a warrantless parole search entry because, given defendant’s drug history, it was reasonable to believe he was destroying drugs. United States v. Sandlain, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129135 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to promptly answer PO’s knock at door was RS for an entry, given drug history

VA: Lifetime suspicionless probation search condition unreasonable

Defendant was convicted of rape and sentenced to 156 years with 140 suspended, or life suspended. He had a suspicionless probation/parole search condition imposed by the court. Lifetime suspension of his Fourth Amendment rights is neither related to the offense … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on VA: Lifetime suspicionless probation search condition unreasonable

CA11: Suspicionless parole searches of cell phone and home here were proper

The parole search of defendant’s home and cell phone was permitted by Samson. He’d signed a parole search waiver that permitted a search at any time. Also, the officers had reasonable suspicion, but Samson doesn’t require that if the parolee … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Suspicionless parole searches of cell phone and home here were proper