FL3: Exclusion of evidence is a separate question from whether 4A was violated

The question of exclusion of the evidence is always separate from whether the Fourth Amendment was violated. Mercado v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 1, 2026).

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his search claim in his murder case. It didn’t matter that he wasn’t told he was waiving it. State v. Baker, 2026-Ohio-3875 (8th Dist. Oct. 1, 2026).*

Reasonable suspicion wasn’t shown from defendant’s slight criminal history, being in an alleged high crime area, and wearing a Washington Nationals hat which the Denver PD associates with gang activity [not to mention the defendant’s last name is Washington]. On the totality, there was no reasonable suspicion for a frisk of him or the car. He was always compliant and respectful to the officers and made no furtive movements. United States v. Washington, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30067 (10th Cir. Oct. 1, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.