OK: Cell phone search warrant based on prior invalid consent search suppressed; no GFE

The pre-Riley search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was based on an invalid consent search, and the good faith exception does not apply to warrants based on a prior illegal search. State v. Thomas, 2014 OK CR 12, 2014 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 11 (September 17, 2014).

Defendant’s parole agreement essentially permits suspicionless searches like in Samson. “The search condition unconditionally allowed searches without limitation concerning who may conduct the search, the purpose of the search (investigatory or supervisory), time, place, and the necessity of a search warrant or cause. Persons on supervised release who sign such provisions in exchange for freedom manifest an awareness that with release comes the possibility of intrusions into their homes. It is evident that parolees enjoy a severely diminished expectation of privacy compared to ordinary citizens and that the State has a substantial interest in supervising parolees ….” Terry v. State, 2014 OK CR 14, 2014 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13 (September 18, 2014).

Defendant consented to the search of his vehicle. State v. Zeno, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2203 (La.App. 1 Cir. September 19, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.