Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

NYTimes: Judges Replacing Conjecture With Formula for Bail

NYTimes: Judges Replacing Conjecture With Formula for Bail by Shaila Dewan: Setting bail is a difficult task for judges. They must try to foretell whether the defendant is likely to commit another crime, hurt someone or skip out on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on NYTimes: Judges Replacing Conjecture With Formula for Bail

SF Chronicle: S.F. study finds big disparity in arrest rates between races

SF Chronicle: S.F. study finds big disparity in arrest rates between races by Kale Williams and Vivian Ho: Black people are disproportionately represented throughout the criminal justice system in San Francisco, from arrest to booking in jail to conviction and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on SF Chronicle: S.F. study finds big disparity in arrest rates between races

IN: Smell of burnt MJ from car allows officer essentially to detain all

Defendant juvenile was a passenger in the back of a car stopped at 1:30 am, and there was a smell of burnt marijuana coming from the car. Under Pringle, that gave the officer cause to get everybody out of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Smell of burnt MJ from car allows officer essentially to detain all

AZ: 911 hang up call justified entry onto curtilage and look in windows when no one answered door

Police received a 911 hang up call, and the call back was unanswered. They are treated as emergencies, and two officers responded. No one answered the door, so they went to a window to look in, and a marijuana plant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Protective sweep | Comments Off on AZ: 911 hang up call justified entry onto curtilage and look in windows when no one answered door

ND: Entry on a misdemeanor warrant was not unreasonable where an occupant said defendant was inside

Entry on a misdemeanor warrant was not unreasonable where an occupant said defendant was inside, following other authorities. State v. Schmidt, 2015 ND 134, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 132 (May 27, 2015):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on ND: Entry on a misdemeanor warrant was not unreasonable where an occupant said defendant was inside

CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

Michigan Hutaree militia members were indicted, tried, and acquitted. Their Bivens action for malicious prosecution fails. The indictment was not based on provably false testimony, and there was thus probable cause for the case to go forward. “The indictment in … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

The Texas exclusionary rule applies to private actors. The club security guards here had at least reasonable suspicion to detain and handcuff defendant for attempting to sell cocaine in the club as a citizen’s detention, akin to a citizen’s arrest. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Private security guards’ detention for police was based on reasonable suspicion

CBS News: Innocent man arrested, jailed twice because of name

CBS News: Innocent man arrested, jailed twice because of name OLIVEHURST, Calif. — Two times, Gilberto Hernandez has been arrested and thrown in jail for crimes he didn’t commit — crimes that were allegedly committed by another man, who, to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CBS News: Innocent man arrested, jailed twice because of name

KS declines to apply exclusionary rule to city officer’s extraterritorial arrest

The Kansas Supreme Court refuses in this case to apply the exclusionary rule to an extraterritorial police operation that resulted in defendant’s arrest, understanding why the trial court suppressed. The legislature modified the common law rule of territoriality somewhat, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on KS declines to apply exclusionary rule to city officer’s extraterritorial arrest

PA: Hot pursuit of a drug dealer to his door permitted warrantless entry when door answered

Officers observed defendant involved in a drug deal and then pursued him to his house and knocked and then entered on answer. This was not a police created exigency. The court engages in a lengthy state constitutional and historical review … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on PA: Hot pursuit of a drug dealer to his door permitted warrantless entry when door answered

TX2: Defense argument at “Catch-22”: If he lived there, arrest warrant good enough to enter; if not, other person consented

Defendant’s argument about the place entered being his home was a “Catch-22” for him. If he lived there, the arrest warrant authorized entry to get him, and the plain view was valid. If he didn’t, the other occupant had authority … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on TX2: Defense argument at “Catch-22”: If he lived there, arrest warrant good enough to enter; if not, other person consented

PA: Fourth Amendment applies to mental commitment proceedings

The Fourth Amendment applies in mental commitment proceedings, and there must be probable cause for the seizure of the person the state seeks to commit. The fact that the criminal rules don’t apply to these proceedings does not mean that … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Fourth Amendment applies to mental commitment proceedings

CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

Defendant was pulled over for possible speeding in a 25 mph zone, and he fled the car, tugging at his pants as he was running, strongly suggesting a gun in his pocket or waistband. One officer tackled him and had … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Use of a police baton on legs to subdue struggling suspect was reasonable; SI of fleeing suspect reasonable and based on fact

D.R.I.: It was reasonable to believe defendant in house entered on arrest warrant when his car had been there and his cell phone ping put him there

Police had reason to believe defendant was in the apartment they entered with an arrest warrant for a Hobbs Act home invasion robbery: “The Court finds that the police reasonably believed prior to entry that Mr. Stewart resided at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on D.R.I.: It was reasonable to believe defendant in house entered on arrest warrant when his car had been there and his cell phone ping put him there

OR: No exigency for entry into home to arrest a DUI suspect; at minimum a telephonic warrant could have been obtained

Police had no exigency to enter defendant’s house and arrest him for suspicion of DUII. He was seen on the street last at 11:01 am, and they had his address from his LPN. They went to his house and saw … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: No exigency for entry into home to arrest a DUI suspect; at minimum a telephonic warrant could have been obtained

D.Utah: A commercial vehicle inspector without state arrest authority could still detain under the Fourth Amendment

Defendant stopped his truck at a weigh station, and a computer check was run on him. It turned out there was an order of protection between him and his passenger, a minor. The commercial vehicle inspector could detain him under … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: A commercial vehicle inspector without state arrest authority could still detain under the Fourth Amendment

OH11: Officer’s delay in investigation of defendant made pursuit no longer “hot pursuit”

The officer had probable cause for defendant’s arrest, but it wasn’t any longer hot pursuit because the officer directed his attention elsewhere. The entry into defendant’s house could not be justified by hot pursuit. State v. Lowe, 2015-Ohio-1064, 2015 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH11: Officer’s delay in investigation of defendant made pursuit no longer “hot pursuit”

M.D.La.: Telling employees they couldn’t leave during a regulatory inspection was a seizure of their person

In a regulatory inspection, “An order not to leave the business premises for two hours can reasonably be understood to constitute a detention as well as a seizure. Although the inspection was conducted according to regulatory authority, the statutory provision … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Telling employees they couldn’t leave during a regulatory inspection was a seizure of their person

IL: Even if def’s cell phone was unlawfully tracked, it wouldn’t void his arrest

The fact police used cell phone tracking information, even if it was illegal, a question not decided, to find defendant didn’t void the search of his person because they clearly had probable cause for his detention and search. (This was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Even if def’s cell phone was unlawfully tracked, it wouldn’t void his arrest

A.F. Ct.Crim.App.: After defendant lawyered up, asking him for his cell phone password violated the Sixth Amendment

After defendant lawyered up, asking him for his cell phone password violated the Sixth Amendment, and the statement giving the password must be suppressed. United States v. Bondo, 2015 CCA LEXIS 89 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. March 18, 2015) (unpublished):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on A.F. Ct.Crim.App.: After defendant lawyered up, asking him for his cell phone password violated the Sixth Amendment