Category Archives: Informant hearsay

NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

The pinging of defendant’s cell phone to find him was without a warrant. If it was constitutional error, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Moorer, 2018 NY Slip Op 00754, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 697 (4th … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

CA7: Summary judgment for gov’t premature in case alleging frame up by crime lab analyst

Summary judgment was improperly granted for the government in a FTCA case that plaintiff was framed by knowingly false testimony from an arson lab analyst. Remanded. Bunch v. United States, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283 (7th Cir. Jan. 30, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Police misconduct, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Summary judgment for gov’t premature in case alleging frame up by crime lab analyst

HI: Defendant could properly be prosecuted for refusing a breath test, but not a blood test

Defendant could properly be prosecuted for refusing a breath test, but not a blood test. State v. Wilson, 2018 Haw. App. LEXIS 25 (Jan. 26, 2018).* Defendant was a mere passenger in the car searched, and he lacks standing to … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on HI: Defendant could properly be prosecuted for refusing a breath test, but not a blood test

DE: Def’s texting victim was nexus to the cell phone

Defendant’s texting the victim gives nexus to the cell phone. There was a temporal limit on the warrant. State v. Rizzo, 2018 Del. Super. LEXIS 44 (Jan. 26, 2018) There was reasonable suspicion for seizure of a FedEx package from … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Def’s texting victim was nexus to the cell phone

NE: Having only key to rented car glovebox and not to car itself didn’t give standing

Having a key to the glovebox of a rented car, but not to the car itself, was not a sufficient reasonable expectation of privacy in the rented car to have standing. Defendant couldn’t get into the car without somebody else … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on NE: Having only key to rented car glovebox and not to car itself didn’t give standing

OR: CI privilege doesn’t require production of CI for in camera review if there is PC

While “Defendant does not challenge the trial court’s further determination that the affidavit contained sufficient information to establish the CI’s reliability and credibility,” he faults the trial court for not having the CI produced for in camera review. The identity … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OR: CI privilege doesn’t require production of CI for in camera review if there is PC

W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Shrugging shoulders in response to a question was consent

OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

Defendant was initially stopped with information from a CI amounting to reasonable suspicion that he was purchasing precursors and ingredients to manufacture methamphetamine. When the police got to his house, it was apparent there was a working meth lab, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

NY4: Officer had RS for encounter that def fled from and hid object under leaves in flight

The officer had reasonable suspicion for an encounter and defendant fled from him, hiding an object under leaves in flight which was abandonment. People v. Thacker, 2017 NY Slip Op 09081, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9104 (4th Dept. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Officer had RS for encounter that def fled from and hid object under leaves in flight

S.D.Ind.: SI of duffle bag at feet of handcuffed suspect reasonable when he wouldn’t answer questions about having gun

Search incident of defendant’s duffle bag was reasonable because, while handcuffed, his hands were relatively mobile around his waist and he refused to answer questions about whether he had a gun. United States v. Veach, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209971 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: SI of duffle bag at feet of handcuffed suspect reasonable when he wouldn’t answer questions about having gun

D.Minn.: Search of house for drug trafficking revealed a surveillance system and DVR; it was reasonable to conclude evidence of trafficking would be on it too for a separate SW

When executing a search warrant for drugs and guns, founded on a strong showing of probable cause, and the police finding pounds of methamphetamine and multiple firearms, discovery of surveillance cameras and a DVR not connected to a satellite or … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Search of house for drug trafficking revealed a surveillance system and DVR; it was reasonable to conclude evidence of trafficking would be on it too for a separate SW

PA: Anonymous tip man on specific bus was armed was insufficient for stop and frisk of def

An anonymous tip that a man on a specific bus was carrying a gun was insufficient to stop and frisk the defendant. When the officer drew a gun on him he was detained, and his subsequent actions could not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on PA: Anonymous tip man on specific bus was armed was insufficient for stop and frisk of def

CA3: Frisk was justified by RS and plain feel of drugs resulted

The officer had reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant, and the drugs in his pocket were discovered by plain feel. United States v. Graves, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 25157 (3d Cir. Dec. 13, 2017). Smell of marijuana during a traffic stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA3: Frisk was justified by RS and plain feel of drugs resulted

Cal.6th: Citizen informant’s report def matched a BOLO of a sex offender justified talking to him, and his probation search condition justified search

A San Jose bus driver thought that a passenger on a bus was a person there was a BOLO out on for having committed a lewd act on a child on a bus that was captured on the bus video. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.6th: Citizen informant’s report def matched a BOLO of a sex offender justified talking to him, and his probation search condition justified search

D.Md.: Nexus shown by def’s car driven to drug deal was registered at his house and he left there to do the deal

Defendant was alleged to have left the address his car was registered at to go to a controlled buy. That showed nexus to the house. United States v. Goldsberry, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199446 (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2017). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Md.: Nexus shown by def’s car driven to drug deal was registered at his house and he left there to do the deal

N.D.Ind.: CI “working off” his own case is not inherently unbelievable because he needs substantial assistance for a 5K1.1

A CI “working off” his own case is not inherently unbelievable. If anything, such a CI has an incentive to be truthful because, if he’s not, he could lose a USSG § 5K1.1 reduction for not substantially assisting the government. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: CI “working off” his own case is not inherently unbelievable because he needs substantial assistance for a 5K1.1

CA8: Def failed to show omission of CI’s background would have vitiated PC

“Claybron argues that the omission of the confidential informant’s background information weighed so heavily on her credibility that, had it been considered, the warrant would not have issued. ‘We review the trial court’s findings of fact for clear error and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA8: Def failed to show omission of CI’s background would have vitiated PC

LA5: CI’s story provided PC for defendant’s stop for a hand-to-hand transaction police then observed

The CI provided probable cause for defendant’s stop for a hand-to-hand transaction. The CI’s story was that was what was going down, and defendant came up to the car and leaned in. While the officers didn’t see what happened in … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on LA5: CI’s story provided PC for defendant’s stop for a hand-to-hand transaction police then observed

NC: IP address on pizza order led to PC for SW for def’s house as robber of driver

A Domino’s driver was robbed and hit with a baseball bat and knocked out. Police looked for possible robbers but found nobody. A “confidential source of information” (actually citizen informant who’s identity was withheld for protection against retaliation) said that … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: IP address on pizza order led to PC for SW for def’s house as robber of driver

NM: Citizen informant’s call about erratic driving was RS for stop when the vehicle was found

Citizen informant’s call to the police about erratic driving was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop when the car was found. State v. Tidey, 2011-NMCA-068, 2017 N.M. App. LEXIS 103 (Oct. 17, 2017). The stop was justified by a lane change … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Citizen informant’s call about erratic driving was RS for stop when the vehicle was found