Category Archives: Standing

D.Neb.: A mere passenger in a car used in a robbery has no standing to challenge the search

Riding in a car to a robbery is not a “sufficiently close connection to the car” to give standing. There was at least reasonable suspicion for the stop based on the robbery call, and then probable cause for their arrest. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Neb.: A mere passenger in a car used in a robbery has no standing to challenge the search

N.D.Ga.: Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window

Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window in the warrant. Phone conversations between defendant and his lawyer over the jail phone system were not subject to attorney-client privilege because there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window

CA9: Intoxicated man freely consented to searches; actions show he knew what he was doing

Intoxicated man freely consented to searches. “Although Smith appeared intoxicated during the two searches, he had already begun cleaning the crime scene, gave his own version of the events, was able to answer the officer’s questions and sign the consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Intoxicated man freely consented to searches; actions show he knew what he was doing

CA3: A corporate shareholder and executive doesn’t have standing in the corporation’s computer server; no personal connection

“To show he can challenge the search of SPI’s and CDS’s offices and the seizure of the employees’ computers and network server as a shareholder and executive, Nagle must show a personal connection to the place searched or to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: A corporate shareholder and executive doesn’t have standing in the corporation’s computer server; no personal connection

D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

In a Medicaid fraud document search warrant, some documents found were outside of the scope of the warrant, but they satisfied the plain view doctrine that their potential incriminating nature was immediately apparent and they were found in the course … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

AR: Community caretaking function justified opening car door of driver asleep in a parking lot at 4:30 am with engine running

Defendant was found in a parking lot at 4:30 am with his lights on and engine running, but asleep. Opening the door was within the community caretaking function. Szabo v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 512, 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 591 … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Ineffective assistance, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Community caretaking function justified opening car door of driver asleep in a parking lot at 4:30 am with engine running

D.Mass.: A paying passenger in a cab has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger compartment

“While the question is close,” the court concludes that a paying passenger in a livery car has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger area of the cab from the police, relying on United States v. Woodrum, 202 F.3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A paying passenger in a cab has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the passenger compartment

D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter. United States v. Pinex, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118558 (D.Mont. September 4, 2015). Packages in the mail … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

OH1: A car listed on the search warrant could be searched away from the premises

“[*P7] Following the issuance of the warrant, RENU agents conducted surveillance on the residence at 3021 Cavanaugh Avenue. According to Deputy Kane, RENU agents would generally wait to execute a search warrant until an occupant left the targeted residence, especially … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: A car listed on the search warrant could be searched away from the premises

W.D.N.Y.: There’s no standing in a dilapidated building def occupies knowing it was de facto condemned

Defendant put a mattress in a dilapidated building that he knew the city wanted unoccupied because it was unsafe. Therefore, the court concludes he has no standing. United States v. Rounds, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117174 (W.D.N.Y. September 2, 2015):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: There’s no standing in a dilapidated building def occupies knowing it was de facto condemned

W.D.Pa.: No standing in an overdue rental car in somebody else’s name

Defendant had no standing in a rental car that was overdue and rented by somebody else who let him drive it. A representative of the rental car company came to the scene to retrieve it, and he consented to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No standing in an overdue rental car in somebody else’s name

OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency

Home burglar alarm brought the police via the alarm company. They found the door cracked open, and that was exigent circumstances for an entry. State v. Foster, 2015-Ohio-3401, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3316 (3d Dist. August 24, 2015). The certified … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency

D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

Defendants moved for return of their property after conviction and the appeal was affirmed. The government gets to keep it pending conclusion of any collateral review which might be filed. United States v. Banks, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107994 (D.Colo. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

M.D.Fla.: Driver of a borrowed vehicle may have standing

The driver of a borrowed vehicle may have standing. United States v. Reina, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106687 (M.D.Fla. August 13, 2015). Here, however, defendants’ possession of a borrowed pickup truck and then fleeing from it shows a lack of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Driver of a borrowed vehicle may have standing

D.Me.: Just having your stuff in a motel room rented by another doesn’t prove you’re an overnight guest

One defendant failed to even attempt to show standing in a motel room rented by a third man. The second defendant failed, too, but he was a little closer to the mark. Just having stuff in the room alone isn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: Just having your stuff in a motel room rented by another doesn’t prove you’re an overnight guest

W.D.Ky.: Where def stole wife’s car, his marital interest in it alone was not standing

Where defendant stole the car he was driving from his wife, his mere ownership interest in the vehicle by marital property is not enough to establish standing. United States v. Williams, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95190 (W.D.Ky. July 22, 2015), … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Where def stole wife’s car, his marital interest in it alone was not standing

D.S.D.: Standing here was established by other witnesses without def even testifying; USMJ erred in denying full hearing

The USMJ found no standing, but defendant did not need to testify to establish standing. Here, there was evidence in the record that others said the duffle bag was defendant’s and his papers were found inside it. That should be … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Standing here was established by other witnesses without def even testifying; USMJ erred in denying full hearing

CA9: Not questioning search likely sound strategy where defense at trial was disassociation from the drugs and the place they were found

Defendant’s IAC claim on his search isn’t proper for direct appeal, and it should proceed in a 2255. “However, counsel may have had strategic reasons not to file a suppression motion to avoid having Birrueta testify. For example, testifying at … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Not questioning search likely sound strategy where defense at trial was disassociation from the drugs and the place they were found

E.D.Ky.: IAC overbroad search claim requires SW be attached or otherwise in the record

In a 2255 IAC, defendant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search warrant of his hotel room as overbroad fails without attaching the warrant so the court can see. It’s not otherwise in the record. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: IAC overbroad search claim requires SW be attached or otherwise in the record

OH9: Def’s innocent explanations don’t per se undermine reasonable suspicion

Defendant’s innocent explanations for being in the parking lot in a high crime area don’t undermine the officer’s reasonable suspicion developed at the time. State v. Starr, 2015-Ohio-2193, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 2113 (9th Dist. June 8, 2015).* The probation … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Def’s innocent explanations don’t per se undermine reasonable suspicion