Category Archives: Standing

CA11: Attorney has no standing in legal mail searched in a prison cell

An attorney of an inmate has no Fourth Amendment right in his client’s prison cell for the opening of prisoner mail during a cell security search. Williams v. Russo, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1063 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2016). Appellate … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Attorney has no standing in legal mail searched in a prison cell

FL1: No standing in a package shipped from and to a fictitious person

Defendant lacked standing in a seizure and search of a package shipped with drugs, and his name was not on the package either as the sender or recipient or in a fictitious business name associated with him. State v. Williams, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on FL1: No standing in a package shipped from and to a fictitious person

D.Minn.: No standing in the search of the person of another

Defendant’s motion to reopen the suppression motion for the third time is denied. He has no standing in the search of somebody else. United States v. Spencer, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174240 (D.Minn. Dec. 11, 2015). The officer ran LPNs … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No standing in the search of the person of another

D.Nev.: Def had no REP in USPS Express Mail with fictitious names; PC for SW included def’s IP address checking tracking of packages on USPS website

US Postal Inspectors found out that defendant was mailing express mail packages weekly from Las Vegas to Memphis from the same USPO facility. They reviewed video of the lobby and found the prior visits. They staked out the lobby and … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def had no REP in USPS Express Mail with fictitious names; PC for SW included def’s IP address checking tracking of packages on USPS website

W.D.N.Y.: Def’s failure to provide affidavit as to his standing justified denying motion to suppress without a hearing

“A hearing is not warranted here to determine the circumstances surrounding whether defendant voluntarily consented to the search. As with his motion to suppress his statements, defendant does not include his own affidavit as to the facts alleged surrounding the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def’s failure to provide affidavit as to his standing justified denying motion to suppress without a hearing

D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

Defendant had standing in his father’s car that he let defendant drive. The inventory of the car and impoundment was not for a legitimate inventory purpose. It was impounded because another police department asked for it. “The government has failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

D.Conn.: While def should have presented affidavit of standing, the SW inventory supports his standing

In a corporate office search, defendant should have presented an affidavit to show his standing in the office space. Despite that, however, the government’s search inventory strongly supports his standing because it shows documents taken from what was described as … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Overbreadth, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Conn.: While def should have presented affidavit of standing, the SW inventory supports his standing

S.D.Fla.: Def has burden of showing standing in business premises; he can’t just rely on govt’s theory of case

Defendant had the burden of showing standing in business premises to challenge the search, and he cannot rely on the government’s theory of the case to do so [the latter is a premise on which I disagree: why isn’t that … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Def has burden of showing standing in business premises; he can’t just rely on govt’s theory of case

CA9 narrows the Heck bar even more; and attendees of a party had no standing to challenge a police entry

In a § 1983 lawsuit over an LAPD entry into a warehouse to break up a music party that resulted in an arrest of a few for resisting, the individual plaintiffs who were attendees of the party lacked standing to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA9 narrows the Heck bar even more; and attendees of a party had no standing to challenge a police entry

Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

The stop of defendant’s vehicle was extended for a dog sniff. The defense argued that it was unreasonable, and the trial court found it was de minimus. Rodriguez was then decided, and it applies. The dog sniff occurred after defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Two on Rodriguez and extended stops

GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

Defendant was not seized, although the stop was long. There was another driver in another car also being dealt with, and the officer had to get another to the scene. Defendant was never told he was under arrest, nor was … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

OH4: Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge pole camera surveillance of friend’s house

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not raising a technical challenge that, at the time, was meritless but the law later changed. The exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply. He also lacked standing to challenge pole camera surveillance of somebody else’s house. … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge pole camera surveillance of friend’s house

W.D.La.: Def transferred his car to get it out of impound while he remained in jail; he had no standing when he arranged an interstate drug run for a co-conspirator

Based on a monitored jail call, officers in Monroe, Louisiana determined that defendant had a co-conspirator drive a car to Dallas to pick up methamphetamine and come right back. They applied for a warrant to install a GPS, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Def transferred his car to get it out of impound while he remained in jail; he had no standing when he arranged an interstate drug run for a co-conspirator

TN: Nexus to def’s house more easily shown when object of search is jewelry from a store robbery

Defendants were accused of a jewelry store heist. The small nature of the items involved makes it more likely they’d be kept at home until disposed of, and that shows nexus. As to standing, defendants without it don’t get to … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Nexus to def’s house more easily shown when object of search is jewelry from a store robbery

OR: Passenger’s backpack in car was subject to automobile exception

Passenger’s backpack in the vehicle at the time of the stop was subject to the automobile exception. State v. Furrillo, 274 Ore. App. 612, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1291 (Nov. 4, 2015). Defendant’s admission during a stop on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OR: Passenger’s backpack in car was subject to automobile exception

WV: SI for fleeing in a car is unreasonable

Defendant was arrested for fleeing in a car and handcuffed. The search incident of the car was unreasonable because defendant was restrained and away from the car, and there was not reason to believe there was anything in the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on WV: SI for fleeing in a car is unreasonable

LA3: The person who owned a document obtained by SW clearly has standing for its return

Somebody was denied a job at a hospital, and complained to the Jefferson Davis Parish Sheriff’s Office who sought a search warrant for the letter received that apparently caused the job denial. A judge pro tem issued the search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on LA3: The person who owned a document obtained by SW clearly has standing for its return

KY: No standing in GPS placed in a borrowed car

Defendant and others were suspects as serial robbers, and the police placed GPS devices on two cars in 2008. On defendant’s, he was not the owner and he just borrowed it. Placing the GPS in the first place was not … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on KY: No standing in GPS placed in a borrowed car

D.Md.: Another NSA suit fails for lack of standing under Clapper

In another case against the NSA, plaintiffs can’t show standing under Clapper because the injury is speculative because the NSA doesn’t tell us what it’s doing, so the case is dismissed. Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency Central Security Service, … Continue reading →

Posted in National security, Standing | Comments Off on D.Md.: Another NSA suit fails for lack of standing under Clapper

OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name

A package containing cocaine was shipped to defendant’s house in the name of her boyfriend. She had no standing in the package because her name wasn’t on it. State v. Padilla, 2015-Ohio-4220, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4112 (9th Dist. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name