Category Archives: Standing

E.D.Wis.: Officers’ threat to get SW was real and justified so consent still voluntary

Defendant was arrested at his house, and his wife later consented to entry to seize a gun. The officers’ threat to get a search warrant if she didn’t consent was genuine and there was probable cause to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Officers’ threat to get SW was real and justified so consent still voluntary

New law review article: Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data

Jennifer Daskal, Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data, 26 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 437 (2017). Abstract:

Posted in Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on New law review article: Notice and Standing in the Fourth Amendment: Searches of Personal Data

W.D.N.Y.: “Affidavit of personal knowledge” to show standing isn’t satisfied by the officer’s police reports

The Second Circuit requires an affidavit of personal knowledge to establish standing to contest a search. The officer’s report wasn’t enough just because the officer believed that defendant’s residence was the target of the search. United States v. Lewis, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: “Affidavit of personal knowledge” to show standing isn’t satisfied by the officer’s police reports

S.D.N.Y.: No standing to complain of CSLI for somebody else’s phone

Defendants have no standing to challenge the seizure of CSLI on telephone numbers they don’t complain are theirs. United States v. Pizarro, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60539 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 10, 2018).* Police seizure of an SD card was by … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Independent source, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No standing to complain of CSLI for somebody else’s phone

E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

Defendants were kicked out of a hotel room for strange and aggressive behavior toward staff, and they hurriedly left. The hotel opened the room to the police and they found drug paraphernalia and, in the toilet, ammunition. There no longer … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

Police encountered defendant and others in a car in a neighborhood where it didn’t seem to belong. The officers pulled up next to their car and talked. Based on furtive movements, the officer believed that defendant had a gun he … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

CA4: Jardines didn’t bar officers from following burnt marijuana smell to def’s apartment

Two officers on bike patrol rode through an apartment complex and smelled burning marijuana. They followed their noses and sniffed at defendant’s place and knocked. The district court erred in suppressing because it read too much into Jardines. The officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Jardines didn’t bar officers from following burnt marijuana smell to def’s apartment

NJ: Police break-in into apartment building common hallway violated REP

In 2010, police broke into the outer door of a two unit apartment building and looked in defendant’s open door. By then, the state courts had already held there was a reasonable expectation of privacy in the common hallway of … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on NJ: Police break-in into apartment building common hallway violated REP

CA8: No standing to challenge a DEA administrative subpoena just used to identify his storage unit for a dog sniff

Defendant had no standing to complain that a DEA administrative subpoena was used to identify the storage unit that was his so the DEA could use a drug dog on his storage unit. Defendant’s plain error argument that a tracking … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: No standing to challenge a DEA administrative subpoena just used to identify his storage unit for a dog sniff

D.Minn.: Chiropractor’s co-def in insurance fraud had no standing in the clinic’s records or chiro’s phone

Defendant was a co-defendant with Schultz, a chiropractor, charged with false insurance claims. “The Court concludes that Defendant Hassan does not have standing to challenge the evidence obtained from Defendant Schulz because Defendant Hassan did not have a reasonable expectation … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Chiropractor’s co-def in insurance fraud had no standing in the clinic’s records or chiro’s phone

M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

Defendant lacked standing in the car a gun was found in. He was free to use the car when he wanted, but he wasn’t at the time of the search. It was his grandfather’s car, there was one key, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

Defendant relied on the affidavit for search warrant as showing his standing, but it didn’t resolve the question, so he fails in his burden of proof and lacks standing. The government showed nexus in the 61 page affidavit for residences … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW didn’t support def’s claim of standing

OH8: No standing in a package neither sent nor to be received by def

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the placing of the GPS tracking device on the package because she was neither the sender nor addressee of the package and demonstrated no reasonable expectation of privacy in the package. The police could validly … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on OH8: No standing in a package neither sent nor to be received by def

GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

Being arrested in an apartment that’s not yours doesn’t confer standing without some proof of a relationship to the property. The evidence at the suppression hearing did not address defendant’s status relative to the apartment; i.e., whether he was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

M.D.Ga.: Defs had standing in borrowed car; no RS because defs’ answers were objectively reasonable

Defendants borrowed a car and had standing in the car because it contained personal records being transported. The stop was unreasonably extended by questions about the trip. The officer found them suspicious, but the court does not. The defendants’ answers … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Defs had standing in borrowed car; no RS because defs’ answers were objectively reasonable

S.D.Ala.: Handwritten corrections on SW required a hearing as to how and why

The government contended in its brief on the motion to suppress that the search warrant was supported by controlled buys and didn’t otherwise support the CI. That requires a hearing. Corrections whiting out the address and changing it is enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Handwritten corrections on SW required a hearing as to how and why

S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

The affidavit for the search warrant alleged the house was defendant’s house. The government was judicially estopped from claiming otherwise in the proceeding without real evidence the affidavit was wrong. [I’ve been arguing this for years; see Treatise § 4.03.] … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

CA11: Becoming defensive about some questioning during stop didn’t rise to RS

Being in a high crime area and then becoming defensive only when the officer asked defendant where his mother lived when it came up was not reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s frisk was unreasonable on the totality. Suppressing the gun found on … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Becoming defensive about some questioning during stop didn’t rise to RS

NY4: Scope of search claim defaulted by not presenting it to trial court

A facial challenge to a search warrant is a question of law, and no hearing is required. On the application, probable cause was shown along with the CI’s reliability. Defendant’s claim the search exceeded the search warrant is defaulted for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Scope of search claim defaulted by not presenting it to trial court

AR: State’s auto insurance database isn’t up to date, but missing insurance record is still PC for a stop

A computer check showed defendant’s vehicle insurance was cancelled, although the database was admittedly often not current with this warning: “The insurance information is provided by the Department of Finance and Administration. Valid insurance policies may exist that are not … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on AR: State’s auto insurance database isn’t up to date, but missing insurance record is still PC for a stop