Category Archives: Consent

ND: BAC consent not coerced just because a penalty extends to refusal

“[¶24] As discussed, an individual’s consent is not coerced simply because an administrative penalty has been attached to refusing the test or that law enforcement recites that law to the driver. Here, examining the totality of the circumstances at the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on ND: BAC consent not coerced just because a penalty extends to refusal

W.D.N.C.: Gov’t civil case for police targeting Hispanic motorists proceeds on 14th Amd. claim

“The United States of America (the ‘Government’) allege that Defendant Terry S. Johnson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Alamance County, North Carolina, engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminatory law enforcement activities directed against Latinos, in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Roadblocks | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Gov’t civil case for police targeting Hispanic motorists proceeds on 14th Amd. claim

IN: After express consent, leading officers through the house was implied consent

Defendant first gave express consent and then led them through the house. Defendant’s mother’s consent was also voluntary and she was warned by the consent form that she could refuse the search. Once officers were inside, defendant’s making a “bee … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: After express consent, leading officers through the house was implied consent

MI: Where lack of consent not in motion to suppress or tried below, it couldn’t be raised on appeal

The motion to suppress was based on a lack of probable cause, but the trial court found consent. On appeal, the lack of consent is challenged, but it wasn’t challenged in the trial court, so it can’t be raised on … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Where lack of consent not in motion to suppress or tried below, it couldn’t be raised on appeal

NY3: Defendant’s denial he was driving vehicle denied him standing

Defendant’s denial he was driving the vehicle the gun was found in had no standing. People v. Anderson, 2014 NY Slip Op 04269, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184 (3d Dept. June 12, 2014). Defendant was on parole, and his … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on NY3: Defendant’s denial he was driving vehicle denied him standing

IN: Suspicionless probation search invalid

Defendant was the roommate of a probationer, and their place was subjected to suspicionless probation search. Indiana, however, is a reasonable suspicion state, so the search was invalid. The search of defendant roommate’s space was unreasonable. State v. Vanderkolk, 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Roadblocks | Comments Off on IN: Suspicionless probation search invalid

CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

Officer’s false statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions in response. United States v. Saafir, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10847 (4th Cir. June 11, 2014). Nexus was shown to seize a murder and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

S.D.N.Y.: Def had a REP in his university owned computer, but they could consent to search

Defendant was employed by NYU, and he obtained a computer under a grant and encrypted the hard drive with multiple layers of protection. He took that computer home every night. NYU became suspicious of his handling of the grant and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def had a REP in his university owned computer, but they could consent to search

N.D.Ga.: Civil protective order in another case not ground to suppress

Evidence uncovered in a civil case involving the defendant here, plaintiff in that case, was turned over by the defense to the government. Defendant can’t suppress that evidence, even if it was illegally obtained or given in violation of a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Civil protective order in another case not ground to suppress

E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

The address was given as Bridge City not Orange, Texas, but the officers misapprehended that the city limits was another block over. There was no chance here that the wrong house was searched, so this is not a constitutional error. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

PA: The contents of a prescription pill bottle are not in plain view

During defendant’s traffic stop, the officer saw a pill bottle. The contents are not in plain view or searchable under the automobile exception. It turned out it was defendant’s prescription medication. The state’s nolle pros motion filed after a notice … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: The contents of a prescription pill bottle are not in plain view

CO finds McNeely violation in blood draw from unconscious defendant; Roberts’s proposal rejected

Defendant was unconscious in a hospital after a car wreck that injured others. An officer at the hospital directed a nurse to draw blood for criminal purposes, but didn’t even think about getting a warrant. The blood draw violated the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CO finds McNeely violation in blood draw from unconscious defendant; Roberts’s proposal rejected

MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not an unreasonable search and seizure or a Fourth Amendment issue. Besides, there was no sign anywhere that there would be a turning over of records to law enforcement. Arbor Farms v. Geostar … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

Two police officers came to defendant’s home to arrest her for DUI, and her husband arguably consented to an entry to arrest her. Her locking herself in the bathroom, however, was a rejection of consent and binding. The officer’s threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

CA11: PC of identity theft in def’s car was sufficient for automobile exception

Postal inspectors had probable cause to believe that there was evidence in defendant’s car, a postal worker suspected of identity theft from people on her route. Alternatively, the search incident doctrine supported the search. United States v. Adigun, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent | Comments Off on CA11: PC of identity theft in def’s car was sufficient for automobile exception

NJ: Defendant’s stepfather’s refusal to consent didn’t bar his mother’s consent under Randolph and Fernandez

Defendant’s stepfather’s refusal to consent didn’t bar his mother’s consent under Randolph and Fernandez. State v. Lamb, 218 N.J. 300, 95 A.3d 123 (2014): The focus of this appeal is whether the strenuously expressed statements by defendant’s stepfather that the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NJ: Defendant’s stepfather’s refusal to consent didn’t bar his mother’s consent under Randolph and Fernandez

New Law Review Article: Consent Searches of Minors

Consent Searches of Minors, Megan Annitto, 38 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 1 (2014). Abstract: Despite the imbalance of power between police officers and citizens, courts rarely find that a search by a police officer based upon consent was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Consent Searches of Minors

NJ: Once RS is satisfied, stop must end; third party consent invalid

Defendant’s initial stop for being involved in a robbery was valid, but it became unreasonable once the victim said he wasn’t the guy. At that point, the detention should have ended. Instead, the police repeatedly asked for and finally got … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Once RS is satisfied, stop must end; third party consent invalid

NYT: P2P searches and “71 Are Accused in a Child Pornography Case, Officials Say”

NYT: 71 Are Accused in a Child Pornography Case, Officials Say by Joseph Berger

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NYT: P2P searches and “71 Are Accused in a Child Pornography Case, Officials Say”

N.D.W.Va.: Law of the case doctrine applies to motion to suppress denied as to codefendant

When a motion to suppress is denied as to one defendant, the law of the case doctrine applies and requires it be denied as to others [except possibly where it was on standing or something like that]. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Law of the case doctrine applies to motion to suppress denied as to codefendant