N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause

Michigan v. Summers (1981) and Bailey v. United States (2013) don’t even apply where there is independent probable cause for the suspect. This motion to suppress is “patently meritless.” United States v. Bocanegra, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86481 (N.D. Ga. February 26, 2014).

The officer told the driver that they were free to go and returned the license before asking for consent. At that point, they were no longer detained, and the consent was otherwise voluntary. State v. Terrell, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 422 (June 25, 2014).*

The search of defendant’s car was valid under the automobile exception or consent. He has no standing to challenge a subpoena to third party for records. United States v. Thomas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86148 (W.D. Ky. June 24, 2014).*

Based on wiretaps, the FBI had information that a load of cocaine was going to be bought and brought back to Memphis. They saw defendant leave, likely with the money, and then called an Arkansas State Police officer with a drug dog to lay in wait for the truck to pass. The officer observed a lane violation and pulled over the defendant, and reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Zuniga, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86339 (W.D. Tenn. June 24, 2014),* R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87153 (W.D. Tenn. April 14, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.