MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not an unreasonable search and seizure or a Fourth Amendment issue. Besides, there was no sign anywhere that there would be a turning over of records to law enforcement. Arbor Farms v. Geostar Corp., 2014 Mich. App. LEXIS 979 (May 27, 2014).

During a traffic stop, the driver’s trembling hands, excessive nervousness, and breaking eye contact when asked about having a weapon was likely enough for a vehicle frisk for a weapon. Then there was a furtive movement with his hands. State v. Butler, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1398 (La. App. 5 Cir. May 28, 2014).*

Delaying a frisk until backup arrived was reasonable. State v. Harris, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1391 (La. App. 2 Cir. May 28, 2014).

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.