Category Archives: Consent

CA5: Texas deer breeding industry is “closely regulated”

Based on prior case law, “the provisions regulating the [Texas] deer breeder industry are sufficiently ‘extensive’ to place that activity ‘squarely within the class of industries to which Burger applies.’” Therefore, it was a closely regulated industry, and the administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Texas deer breeding industry is “closely regulated”

NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, and it was denied because defendant did not show he was anything other than a transient guest in the premises. An affidavit from the owner was presented the day of the plea that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

Police gathering of IP information about peer-to-peer networks is a legitimate investigative technique, and it violates no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Baalerud, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37650 (W.D.N.C. March 25, 2015).* 2255 petitioner’s sentence was increased for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

CA10: Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap

Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap. United States v. Ocegueda, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4867 (10th Cir. March 25, 2015). Defendant consented to a patdown … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap

IL: Even if def’s cell phone was unlawfully tracked, it wouldn’t void his arrest

The fact police used cell phone tracking information, even if it was illegal, a question not decided, to find defendant didn’t void the search of his person because they clearly had probable cause for his detention and search. (This was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Even if def’s cell phone was unlawfully tracked, it wouldn’t void his arrest

IN: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of front door suppressed

Defendant had an interlocutory appeal of a search issue, and law of the case controls that. Jardines was, however, decided one month after the appeal, and defendant can raise it on appeal now because it was preserved, and it controls. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IN: Pre-Jardines dog sniff of front door suppressed

NY3: Voluntarily removing drugs from rectum during visual body search was consent

Defendant was suspected of drug dealing because of intercepted telephone calls and the use of coded words. When he was stopped, officers found Vaseline, and they knew that was used to hide drug evidence in the rectum. They had enough … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Voluntarily removing drugs from rectum during visual body search was consent

E.D.Tenn.: Lack of warning book-in phone was being recorded required suppression under Title III; Fourth Amendment issue not decided

Defendant made a call on a jail phone from the booking area that had no sign or warning on the call that the call was being recorded. The Fourth Amendment generally means that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Lack of warning book-in phone was being recorded required suppression under Title III; Fourth Amendment issue not decided

WA: Ferrier warnings of a right to refuse a search of the home on a knock-and-talk must come before the police enter the house, not after

Washington’s Ferrier warnings of a right to refuse a search of the home on a knock-and-talk must come before the police enter the house, not after. State v. Budd, 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 439 (March 3, 2015):

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk | Comments Off on WA: Ferrier warnings of a right to refuse a search of the home on a knock-and-talk must come before the police enter the house, not after

IN: Conditioning getting out of a vehicle during a traffic stop on a patdown was valid consent

Unless police have reasonable suspicion that a subject is armed and dangerous, they may generally conduct a pat-down for officer safety only with the subject’s voluntary consent. Here, Defendant asked to step out of his truck during a traffic stop, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Conditioning getting out of a vehicle during a traffic stop on a patdown was valid consent

M.D.La.: An interstate bus driver has common authority to consent to search of luggage on his bus[!]

Defendant was a passenger on a Tornado Bus Company bus, a company that hauls primarily Hispanic passengers around the U.S. This trip was from Houston to Atlanta. The bus was stopped in Louisiana for swerving over the line. The driver … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on M.D.La.: An interstate bus driver has common authority to consent to search of luggage on his bus[!]

CA11: State court DNA consent finding was reasonable under AEDPA

The 2254 CoA was granted as to a DNA consent after invocation of the right to remain silent in a death case. “As to the DNA consent, Everett has not demonstrated that the Florida Supreme Court’s decision—that the request for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA | Comments Off on CA11: State court DNA consent finding was reasonable under AEDPA

W.D.Pa.: Five week old information in a weapons case not stale

Because weapons have enduring value to the possessor, a five week delay in using that information to search defendant’s house was not stale. United States v. Korey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20532 (W.D.Pa. February 20, 2015). Defendant’s wife could consent … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Five week old information in a weapons case not stale

OR: Continuing stop that led to a patdown was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, but the officer was more concerned about the passenger being involved in identity theft. After the traffic offense was resolved and the passenger was going to drive, the officer got consent to a … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Continuing stop that led to a patdown was unreasonable

D.Kan.: The KHP two-step to get consent from a motorist

Defendant was pulled over for driving in the left lane of an empty Interstate highway, which actually violates Kansas law. Defendant was told he was free to leave, and the court describes how the officer tells the defendant he was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Kan.: The KHP two-step to get consent from a motorist

OH3: “[Y]ou’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do” was consent to a blood draw

Defendant finally said in apparent exasperation about a blood test: “you’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do.” This was a valid consent on the totality. State v. Hosko, 2015-Ohio-570, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 530 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH3: “[Y]ou’re gonna do what you’re gonna do. Do what you gotta do” was consent to a blood draw

W.D.Wis.: A wired CI can video a statement of the defendant in his house

Defendant invited a wired CI into his place who video recorded only his conversations with him. This doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment, citing the “false friend” cases. United States v. Thompson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18600 (W.D. Wis. February 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: A wired CI can video a statement of the defendant in his house

D.C.Cir.: Affirmance of def conviction for felonious assault on officer was a Heck bar to a Bivens action for his shooting

Plaintiff drove at U.S. Marshals, clipped their car, and fled from them, and they opened fire on him. He was convicted of felonious assault on one of the three officers, and acquitted as to the other two. This was a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Affirmance of def conviction for felonious assault on officer was a Heck bar to a Bivens action for his shooting

M.D.Tenn.: Consent to search bags off a bus did not include destroying picture frames to search them

Consent to search defendant’s bags when he came off a bus did not include destroying picture frames to look inside them. His failure to object after being held for hours also wasn’t consent. Also, defendant’s invocation of his right to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Consent to search bags off a bus did not include destroying picture frames to search them

D.Kan.: Defendants voluntarily extended the traffic stop

Defendants were stopped in a rental car after pulling off to avoid a ruse checkpoint sign, and then they failed to stop at a stop sign. The officer’s statement to keep their hands in view was not coercive and did … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Defendants voluntarily extended the traffic stop