NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, and it was denied because defendant did not show he was anything other than a transient guest in the premises. An affidavit from the owner was presented the day of the plea that defendant was an overnight guest, and the trial court again denied the motion that this was not newly discovered evidence. Defendant’s plea was set aside on other grounds, but the court also said that defendant should have gotten a renewed suppression hearing with the affidavit, which he will now get on remand. People v. Wiggins, 2015 NY Slip Op 02517, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2552 (3d Dept. March 26, 2015).

The informant in this health fraud investigation was a non-participant observer of the alleged crime and appeared voluntarily and gave information to the investigators. They followed up with a preliminary investigation which was partly ambiguous. Nevertheless, defendant was indicted. She is not entitled to a Franks hearing because the omitted patient information was not material to the PC. United States v. Faux, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37051 (D.Conn. March 24, 2015).*

Defendant was stopped in his car in the vicinity of a shots fired call at 12:14 am. His clothes were wet and feet muddy. He consented to a search of his car after being told he had a right to refuse. United States v. Watts, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38106 (D.Del. March 26, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.