Category Archives: Franks doctrine

W.D.Okla.: The detailed nature of how CP file sharing tracking software works isn’t required to show PC

In a child pornography investigation, DHS used investigative software named Torrential Downpour which is used to track file sharing on P2P computers looking for child porn for transfer and monitoring data flow. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: The detailed nature of how CP file sharing tracking software works isn’t required to show PC

D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter. United States v. Pinex, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118558 (D.Mont. September 4, 2015). Packages in the mail … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: An unauthorized driver of a rental car still has standing to challenge its search as long as permission was given by the renter

N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

Defendant consented to search of his cell phone. Proof of knowledge of rights comes from the fact he earlier gave a limited consent to search other property. United States v. Thurman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117893 (N.D. Ill. September 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Prior limited consent showed this search was by consent

E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

“Yet, as illustrated above, the record does not contain sufficient information from which the Court can find that a suppression motion would have been meritless. As a result, the Court concludes that an evidentiary hearing is required on this claim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 2255 gets hearing on IAC claim; court can’t say that waived issue was meritless or strategic

E.D.La.: Omitted informant information needs to be dispositive to undermine PC

More information could probably be included in all search warrant affidavits, but that doesn’t make them misleading for omissions. The omissions must be “dispositive” of probable cause, not just cast a little doubt on it. United States v. Wijetunge, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Omitted informant information needs to be dispositive to undermine PC

ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

A drug dog putting his nose up to the open window during an exterior dog sniff was not a search of the interior. The officers didn’t tell him to do it, and the dog was just following his smell (citing … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

CA10: Extended border search of truck that had been flagged was with RS

Defendant’s vehicle was subjected to a border search in February 2013 and an empty hidden compartment was found after a dog alert. That information was entered in the computer. In September, defendant came through the border twice, and a border … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Extended border search of truck that had been flagged was with RS

W.D.N.C.: Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit

Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit for search warrant. Even exculpatory information doesn’t always undermine probable cause. United States v. Awtrey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103284 (W.D.N.C. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit

W.D.Pa.: A sweep upstairs was justified by voices, even though it turned out to be a TV set

The officer’s testimony about exigent circumstances is credited. It was also reasonable for an officer to go upstairs for a sweep after hearing a voice, even though that voice turned out to be from a television set. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: A sweep upstairs was justified by voices, even though it turned out to be a TV set

E.D.Pa.: Def gets return of property seized 7½ years ago

Defendant is entitled to return of property originally seized 7½ years ago to prosecute him that is not contraband and no longer needed. United States v. Green, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85174 (E.D.Pa. June 30, 2015). A state law enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def gets return of property seized 7½ years ago

IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

“[C]ourts have repeatedly and routinely held that a warrant that authorizes the search of ‘premises’ at a given residential address allows the search of detached garages, sheds, and other outbuildings even if these separate structures are not mentioned at all … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

D.Conn.: Consent finally given to show cooperation with LEOs was voluntary

Officers did not need probable cause to believe defendant would be at his address, just a reasonable belief to execute an arrest warrant. After the arrest, he refused repeatedly consent and insisted on a warrant. While officers were off getting … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Consent finally given to show cooperation with LEOs was voluntary

IA: Failure to cite state constitution to trial court was a waiver

A state wildlife officer approached defendant at a boat ramp during ice fishing season. No lights; car not blocked or pulled over. It was not a “stop.” The officer approached only to see if defendant had a fishing license, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Failure to cite state constitution to trial court was a waiver

NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, and it was denied because defendant did not show he was anything other than a transient guest in the premises. An affidavit from the owner was presented the day of the plea that … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

CA8: Where driveway encircles house and car parked in back, curtilage not violated

Officers did not violate the curtilage by driving down a road looking for somebody when they came upon a house with a driveway that went around it, and the only car was parked behind it. They parked there and encountered … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Nighttime search | Comments Off on CA8: Where driveway encircles house and car parked in back, curtilage not violated

E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

A parole search under Michigan law only requires reasonable suspicion. An anonymous tip in the past has been held not enough. Here, however, the anonymous telephone tip was consistent with some of defendant’s parole violations, so here it’s enough. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

W.D.Ky.: “Logical inferences cannot constitute false or misleading statements” for Franks purposes

Based on a jail call that confederates were “‘moving their stuff’ to the ‘new place’” it was a logical inference it was the place named in the search warrant. Defendant’s Franks challenge that the inference isn’t supportable fails. “Logical inferences … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: “Logical inferences cannot constitute false or misleading statements” for Franks purposes

CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

A single access to child pornography from an IP address linked to defendant was not enough to find probable cause that the defendant had child pornography on the computer. The good faith exception, however, was sufficient to sustain the warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

D.Utah: Owner of the truck doesn’t always have standing in the trailer being pulled

Defendant had no standing in a stolen trailer even though he owned the truck pulling it. Similar is United States v. Abreu, 935 F.2d 1130, 1132 (10th Cir. 1991). United States v. Hayes, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22860 (D.Utah February … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Owner of the truck doesn’t always have standing in the trailer being pulled

W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission

“The charges against Moran arise from an assault that occurred on May 31, 2006, and its alleged relationship to the Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Club, Rochester Charter (‘Hell’s Angels’), a purported enterprise within the meaning of the racketeering statute.” After an … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission