CA10: Extended border search of truck that had been flagged was with RS

Defendant’s vehicle was subjected to a border search in February 2013 and an empty hidden compartment was found after a dog alert. That information was entered in the computer. In September, defendant came through the border twice, and a border patrol officer had an alert sent to his cell phone that he was back. The vehicle was first stopped as all were and waved through thinking it was the wrong truck, but it was stopped again 15 miles north of the border, and 15 kg of cocaine were in the hidden compartment. The extended border stop was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Padilla-Esparza, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14340 (10th Cir. August 14, 2015).

Defendant was denied a Franks hearing because he couldn’t show that Agent Lies lied. “The Magistrate Judge concluded that ‘Lilley ha[d] not made the necessary preliminary showing that Agent Lies intentionally or recklessly misled the issuing judge by omitting critical information, the inclusion of which would undermine probable cause.’” United States v. Lilley, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107171 (W.D.Tenn. August 14, 2015),* R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107876 (W.D.Tenn. July 30, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.