Category Archives: Franks doctrine

CA4: Denial of post-trial Franks motion here subject to plain error review

Defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing came post-trial. The court of appeals declines to deny it for lack of timeliness and denies it on the merits. The Franks burden is heavy, and the record is scant. So, he’s relegated to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA4: Denial of post-trial Franks motion here subject to plain error review

D.Nev.: The fact def’s FIPF prior had a suspended sentence wasn’t material for Franks

A state telephonic search warrant was issued based on allegations that defendant was a felon in possession of a firearm. The fact he got a suspended sentence and it was omitted from the application for the warrant isn’t material. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: The fact def’s FIPF prior had a suspended sentence wasn’t material for Franks

W.D.Ark.: The “traffic stop” was actually a PC stop for drugs

This was not even a traffic stop, although it appeared one to the defendant. Actually, it was based on a CI’s information involving drugs and was with probable cause, so the extension of the stop with reasonable suspicion didn’t even … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: The “traffic stop” was actually a PC stop for drugs

WaPo: Two people were killed in a botched drug raid. Investigators say the official story was a lie.

WaPo: Two people were killed in a botched drug raid. Investigators say the official story was a lie. by Brittney Martin and Eli Rosenberg:

Posted in Franks doctrine, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: Two people were killed in a botched drug raid. Investigators say the official story was a lie.

WaPo: A [SF] judge signed a warrant to search a journalist. But police didn’t tell her the whole story.

WaPo: A judge signed a warrant to search a journalist. But police didn’t tell her the whole story.

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: A [SF] judge signed a warrant to search a journalist. But police didn’t tell her the whole story.

W.D.Va.: Def satisfies burden to get a Franks hearing by showing material omissions

Defendant satisfies his burden to get a Franks hearing by showing material omissions from the affidavit. United States v. Anderson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122131 (W.D. Va. July 23, 2019):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def satisfies burden to get a Franks hearing by showing material omissions

CA4: Def counsel not ineffective for not filing CSLI motion before Carpenter

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not anticipating Carpenter by filing a CSLI motion before it was decided. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 21716 (4th Cir. July 22, 2019). Defendant’s motion to prevent a search of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: Def counsel not ineffective for not filing CSLI motion before Carpenter

OH5: PC is determined on the totality, not each isolated fact

Defendant’s challenge to probable cause for the search warrant isolates each fact. Applying the totality of circumstances, there is probable cause. State v. Beightler, 2019-Ohio-2946, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3037 (5th Dist. July 18, 2019).* Defendant doesn’t meet the Franks … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: PC is determined on the totality, not each isolated fact

N.D.Ill.: Moving place of search of belongings away from alley where def was arrested to inside wasn’t unreasonable

Officers had a warrant for defendant’s person and belongings. It wasn’t unreasonable to move the place of the search from the alley where he was arrested inside, even as a search incident. United States v. Sanchez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Moving place of search of belongings away from alley where def was arrested to inside wasn’t unreasonable

PA: Motions for return of property seized by SW are addressed to judge supervising the GJ that sought them

Motions for return of property seized by search warrant issued for a Statewide Investigating Grand Jury are to be addressed to the judge supervising the grand jury. In re Return of Seized Property, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 3845 (July 17, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on PA: Motions for return of property seized by SW are addressed to judge supervising the GJ that sought them

W.D.N.Y.: Govt gets benefit of GFE which overrides Franks [without sufficiently telling us why]

Defendant twice asked the USMJ for a Franks hearing and never got one. On review, application of the good faith exception is sustained. “Here, the Government has shown that McMahon and the other law enforcement officers that executed the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Govt gets benefit of GFE which overrides Franks [without sufficiently telling us why]

UT: 40 minute delay for dog was reasonable where it was tied up in another part of same investigation

The 40 minute delay for the dog sniff, already based on reasonable suspicion, was reasonable. The dog was at a residence related to the same investigation then came to where the car was stopped. The court also mentions the weather … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on UT: 40 minute delay for dog was reasonable where it was tied up in another part of same investigation

CA6: Complaint about minor irrelevant details doesn’t satisfy Franks burden

Defendant failed to satisfy his pleading burden under Franks about the omission of “several seemingly irrelevant details excluded from the affidavit” for which materiality isn’t attempted to be shown. United States v. Shaffer, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 20200 (6th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Complaint about minor irrelevant details doesn’t satisfy Franks burden

N.D.Cal.: Govt bears burden of showing attachment limiting search was actually attached, and it failed

For the government to rely on the good faith exception by claiming the attachment limiting the warrant was attached to the search warrant, it bears the burden of showing that, and it didn’t. United States v. Chang, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Govt bears burden of showing attachment limiting search was actually attached, and it failed

CA8: Second attempt at knock-and-talk wasn’t unreasonable under Jardines

Officers went to defendant’s home for a knock-and-talk and could smell green marijuana. Their second attempt at a knock-and-talk wasn’t unreasonable under Jardines. United States v. White, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 19446 (8th Cir. June 28, 2019). “Ferguson, however, does … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on CA8: Second attempt at knock-and-talk wasn’t unreasonable under Jardines

CA6: Dist Ct erred in concluding it was reasonable to believe ptf abandoned his home; finding of QI reversed

The district court erred in granting qualified immunity to officers who decided that the plaintiff had abandoned his rented home by disclaiming ownership in the property. He was clearly a guest at the minimum or a renter at most, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Dist Ct erred in concluding it was reasonable to believe ptf abandoned his home; finding of QI reversed

M.D.Fla.: Record supports def abandoned CD-Rom of CP

The record supports the conclusion that defendant abandoned a CD-Rom of child pornography, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing it. Rogers v. Sec’y, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107788 (M.D. Fla. June 27, 2019).* The trial court’s finding there … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Record supports def abandoned CD-Rom of CP

S.D.Fla.: Ptf sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and QI

Plaintiff sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and qualified immunity. Wooden v. Armenteros, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106113 (S.D. Fla. June 25, 2019).* “At this stage of the proceedings, viewing the evidence in the light most … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Ptf sufficiently pled a civil Franks claim that survives summary judgment and QI

MA: SW in ongoing criminal enterprise was based on “powerful evidence”

“A Superior Court judge erred in granting a criminal defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized by police from the defendant’s home and place of business, where the affidavit in support of the search warrants contained sufficient information to justify … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: SW in ongoing criminal enterprise was based on “powerful evidence”

S.D.Fla.: Waving a gun at a crowd is PC for assault

Defendant’s waving a gun at a crowd was probable cause, and it was on video. United States v. Leonard, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97917 (S.D. Fla. June 11, 2019).* “The defendants have not shown that Det. Miller was reckless or … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Waving a gun at a crowd is PC for assault