CA6: Complaint about minor irrelevant details doesn’t satisfy Franks burden

Defendant failed to satisfy his pleading burden under Franks about the omission of “several seemingly irrelevant details excluded from the affidavit” for which materiality isn’t attempted to be shown. United States v. Shaffer, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 20200 (6th Cir. July 8, 2019).

The stop was valid based on the officer’s observation that the windshield was cracked from one side to the other. United States v. Hackett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111735 (D. Mont. June 5, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.