Category Archives: Franks doctrine

E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

Alleged ambiguities in the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t show a Franks violation where there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020). A 911 call from a cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

Defendant was stopped for sitting in a park with his bicycle after hours, a violation of a county ordinance. The search incident of his backpack for this offense violated the Florida Constitution. Booker v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

Defendant does not offer further context or analysis. Based upon his failure to fully address this issue, the Defendant’s argument regarding an alleged illegal search and seizure is denied without prejudice. See United States v. Collins, 796 F.3d 829, 836 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

A search warrant to search an apartment and seize computers and cell phones includes the power to search them later. United States v. Quinonez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55789 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2020). The officer’s statement that the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

W.D.Ky.: Franks challenge fails because of complete lack of materiality

Moreover, Perkins did not — and cannot — make a preliminary showing that any alleged ‘false statement or material omission [was] necessary to the probable cause finding in the affidavit.’ If the Court were to strike every contested statement from … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Franks challenge fails because of complete lack of materiality

E.D.Wis.: Franks hearing denied; even if what def says is true, PC not undermined

Defendant makes a Franks challenge to events recounted from one day in the time line, which the court finds not material to the ultimate showing of probable cause. Therefore, there was an insufficient preliminary showing for a hearing. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Franks hearing denied; even if what def says is true, PC not undermined

D.Alaska: No Franks duty to tell issuing magistrate of failed challenges to same CP search software elsewhere

The FBI agent applying for the search warrant had no Franks duty to tell the issuing magistrate that Torrential Downpour, the software they were using, had been challenged elsewhere where the challenges had failed. United States v. Schwier, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.Alaska: No Franks duty to tell issuing magistrate of failed challenges to same CP search software elsewhere

W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

The government’s use of specialized software to search peer-to-peer files didn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy claim. “RoundUp, software with certain technological modifications to a public, open-source P2P network sharing client, is designed to access public files that individuals … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

The search of defendant’s room was six hours before the search warrant was issued. It was an investigative search and not a protective sweep. The officer admitted that he was looking for something to put in the affidavit for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

A controlled buy was probable cause. The claim that the CI lied isn’t cognizable under Franks. United States v. Sheridan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36163 (N.D. Ohio. Mar. 3, 2020). There were disputed questions of fact on whether it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

NC: Ordering traffic detainee to get in police car and shut door after stop should have been over unreasonably extended it

The officer unreasonably extended the stop past the time for resolving the alleged traffic violations. He told defendant to get into the police car, and defendant did, but left the passenger door open with his right leg out. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: Ordering traffic detainee to get in police car and shut door after stop should have been over unreasonably extended it

D.P.R.: Franks motion that only sets up a “swearing match” for witnesses is inadequate

Defendant’s unsworn motion for a Franks hearing fails to identify the materiality of the alleged misstatement and that it was knowingly false. Setting up a “swearing match” for a hearing doesn’t satisfy Franks. United States v. Figueroa-Rivera, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Franks motion that only sets up a “swearing match” for witnesses is inadequate

TX9: Witness and ADAs allegedly providing false information for SWs are absolutely immune from civil cases

Witnesses who had provided affidavits in the underlying criminal case were entitled to absolute witness immunity, regardless of whether they gave false testimony. Prosecutors in that case who allegedly participated in falsifying evidence and writing a perjured search warrant were … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX9: Witness and ADAs allegedly providing false information for SWs are absolutely immune from civil cases

E.D.Wis.: There were false statements in the boilerplate, but they weren’t material

The USMJ determined that defendant made his burden of showing material falsity in the boilerplate information in the affidavit for search warrant and granted a Franks hearing. In a really long opinion, the USDJ agrees with the falsity but finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: There were false statements in the boilerplate, but they weren’t material

S.D.Ga.: Search incident of def’s room on his arrest was valid even though he’d just been removed

The search incident of defendant’s room was valid because it occurred shortly after his arrest when he was still there, despite his being handcuffed which doesn’t per se make a search incident invalid. “Because defendant failed to allege facts which, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Search incident of def’s room on his arrest was valid even though he’d just been removed

OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

Appellate counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a prior decision should be overruled when it would not likely be. State v. Newton, 2020-Ohio-376, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 340 (8th Dist. Jan. 30, 2020).* Defendant’s claims of deficient performance were … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

OH12: Officer’s objectively reasonable mistake as to traffic violation will support stop

The dashcam didn’t catch defendant’s lane violation because the officer saw it through the driver’s window. The trial court credited that a traffic violation supported the stop. Even an objectively reasonable mistake as to the traffic offense supports the stop, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH12: Officer’s objectively reasonable mistake as to traffic violation will support stop

S.D.N.Y.: In a 3 page affidavit for SW, showing the crimes under investigation was particular enough

The affidavits for search warrant are only three pages long, and they reference the crimes under investigation on page one or the first paragraph. That is enough here to show particularity. “The Court concludes that the fact that these brief … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: In a 3 page affidavit for SW, showing the crimes under investigation was particular enough

W.D.Mo.: For purposes of entry on an arrest warrant, officers can reasonably believe def had two addresses

“Under the facts of this case, the Court concludes that law enforcement agents had the requisite reasonable belief that Sparks was residing at 6825 Walrond Avenue and/or 5501 Smart Avenue and was present at the addresses at the time of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: For purposes of entry on an arrest warrant, officers can reasonably believe def had two addresses

CA9: Tasering a man in his own bed not cooperating in being arrested could be found excessive

A jury could reasonably conclude that using a Taser on plaintiff lying on his own bed, on his cell phone trying to call his lawyer, who didn’t violently resist but just pulled his arm away, was an unreasonable use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Tasering a man in his own bed not cooperating in being arrested could be found excessive