Category Archives: Franks doctrine

E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s civil case over his criminal case might run afoul of Heck so it’s ordered stayed

It appears that plaintiff’s complaint over his criminal case would likely be barred under Heck if he’s convicted. Therefore, it is administratively closed and stayed. McClain v. Morales, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53173 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 22, 2021). Defendant’s motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s civil case over his criminal case might run afoul of Heck so it’s ordered stayed

D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

Grand jury subpoenas are a proper method of obtaining bank records under the Right to Financial Privacy Act enacted after Miller. Also, suppression and dismissal aren’t remedies under the Act. United States v. Lundahl, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52211 (D.S.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense

Defendant in a fraud offense pled that federal regulators should have been cited in the affidavit for search warrant so the issuing magistrate will appreciate that this might not be a fraud. That’s not the point of a search warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Affiant in fraud case wasn’t required to cite CFRs on background for the defense

S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

In a child in need of services case, a well pled Franks violation can state a claim, but this one wasn’t. Grullon v. Administrator for Children’s Services, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021) (recognizing rule; citing Estiverne … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not calling defendant to testify at the suppression hearing to avoid potential further admissions of guilt [What about Simmons v. United States and its “immunity”?], and defense counsel was confident standing was shown. Moreover, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

Defendant was searched and arrested for a concealed weapon. That did not prohibit the officers from further searching his personal effects in his clothes. State v. Zepernick, 2021-Ohio-719, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 724 (7th Dist. Mar. 4, 2021). 2254 petitioner’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Search incident proper after concealed weapon found on def

N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

Defendant prevails in his Franks challenge. The police withheld that defendant was at worst a suspect in personal use of marijuana, but made it look like he was a trafficker when they had no evidence of it. That means that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

The protective sweep finding defendant’s guns on execution of his arrest warrant was reasonable. Defendant does not show that the officers intentionally delayed his arrest with the purpose of exploiting a protective sweep. United States v. Cammon, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

The 121 page affidavit for search warrant for evidence of drug trafficking was neither stale nor lacked nexus. Defendant’s Franks challenge also fails for lack of a substantial preliminary showing. United States v. Briggs, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44653 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Just because defense counsel finds an omitted fact interesting doesn’t make it “material”; not all facts need be included

WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

Citation alone to the state constitution’s search and seizure without cogent argument for differentiating Fourth Amendment cases is waiver. The totality of information before the officer in the traffic stop justified it. Elmore v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 48 (Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, State constitution | Comments Off on WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

In response to defendant’s motion to suppress, the government argued search incident, which the defense didn’t rebut in the papers. Motion denied in part. Defendant’s cell phone seizure is suppressed, however, because the government didn’t show justification for its seizure. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

E.D.Ky.: Not all exculpatory evidence needs to be in the affidavit for SW under Franks

Omission of two allegedly exculpatory pieces of information from the affidavit for search warrant didn’t undercut the probable cause shown by what was there. Not all exculpatory information needs to be provided: “Moreover, it is unreasonable to expect a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Not all exculpatory evidence needs to be in the affidavit for SW under Franks

E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

Defendant’s 2254 claim that his arrest was without probable cause on mistaken identity is foreclosed by Stone v. Powell the same as Fourth Amendment search claims. “The opportunity, regardless of whether it is acted upon at the state level, is … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

The Franks hearing established that the officer didn’t know that certain things happened during the investigation, so the officer wasn’t withholding information or misleading the court. Probable cause and nexus is [less than] tenuous: “This evidence, standing alone, does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

Defendant’s 2255 claimed that defense counsel was ineffective for not making a Franks challenge. Defendant’s offer of proof is rejected as just without any credibility at all in light of the record previously made. United States v. Petruk, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

Defendant made a Franks challenge. Removing the allegedly offending material still left probable cause. Defendant’s argument then was that the remainder still didn’t point to him, but that’s not the law: Search warrants are directed at places, too, not just … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

CA1: Dist.Ct. erred in suppressing inventory which followed SOP

Defendant was stopped for a lane violation, and it turned out he had no DL. He wasn’t arrested but the vehicle was impounded and searched incident to that, even though defendant would likely go with the tow truck driver to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on CA1: Dist.Ct. erred in suppressing inventory which followed SOP

N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy

Defense counsel wasn’t obliged to raise a Franks issue in closing argument. That’s quintessentially a strategic decision. “The Supreme Court has recognized that ‘judicious selection of arguments for summation is a core exercise of defense counsel’s discretion,’ and counsel ‘is … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy

M.D.Fla.: State court’s findings on PC [not appealed] not binding on federal court

A state court’s findings of lack of probable cause to proceed with some charges against the defendant isn’t binding on federal courts. “Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, including the 911 calls, bodycam footage, and the credible and … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: State court’s findings on PC [not appealed] not binding on federal court