Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

D.Ore.: No REP in a govt computer and email where there were banner warnings at every sign in

Defendant’s government work emails were searched without a warrant, and it’s clear, based on warnings on the computer at every sign in and regular training, that he was well aware everything on the computer has no reasonable expectation of privacy. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, E-mail, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No REP in a govt computer and email where there were banner warnings at every sign in

E.D.Ky.: Govt didn’t exceed NCMEC’s private search

NCMEC was a private entity and not a government actor. The government didn’t exceed the private search. United States v. Kendall, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192442 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 6, 2019). Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in an … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell site location information, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Govt didn’t exceed NCMEC’s private search

C.D.Cal.: LA ordinance on providing hotel rental info valid under Patel

An LA ordinance requires certain information from hotel and motel renters which survives analysis under Patel. The information is not private information, and it’s not even a search. If it was, it would be a valid administrative search. City of … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: LA ordinance on providing hotel rental info valid under Patel

CA9: Use of another’s wireless router was not protected by any REP; police tracked def with Moocherhunter

After child pornography was found exchanged on a peer-to-peer connection from a specific IP address, government agents got a search warrant for that home address in apartment 242. Once there, they determined that no devices there were involved. They found, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: Use of another’s wireless router was not protected by any REP; police tracked def with Moocherhunter

GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room expires with the checkout time. Lindsey v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Oct. 29, 2019). The defendant officers were properly entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force claim. Also, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

D.P.R.: Def’s avowed lack of connection to the borrowed car he had was a lack of REP

Defendant’s avowed lack of connection to the car he borrowed and was driving was a lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Villa-Guillén, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185672 (D.P.R. Oct. 25, 2019)*:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def’s avowed lack of connection to the borrowed car he had was a lack of REP

IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

There was nexus for the search warrant for defendant’s house where he was alleged to have left his house and driven directly to the scene of a controlled buy where he was delivering. People v. Teague, 2019 IL App (3d) … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

The government proved inevitable discovery. “The record makes clear that before Alston made any involuntary admissions, Captain Aleem believed that Alston possessed a gun, had the probable cause necessary to search the car, and intended to find the gun. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

N.D.Fla.: Def’s coming to door and at threshold made him capable of being arrested without police entering home

When defendant came to the door and answered the officers’ knock, and moved into the threshold when they said they were “security forces,” he was subject to arrest right there without the officers violating the privacy of the home. They … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Def’s coming to door and at threshold made him capable of being arrested without police entering home

N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

Defendant did not own the premises searched, but he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in it because of his connection to it. Also, criminal acts on the premises is not a waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy. Minnesota … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

Warrantless retrieval of data from the airbag control module (ACM) from a vehicle after a car crash was a search that required a warrant. Mobley v. State, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 694 (Oct. 21, 2019).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

The DEA set up a pole camera across the street from defendant’s house to watch the comings and goings expecting a car to go to New Mexico with drugs. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what the camera … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

OH2: Part owner of a business didn’t have standing to challenge seizure of surveillance DVR with video of him committing assault

Defendant was a part owner of a business with computer access cards to get in doors. He still didn’t have a sufficient reasonable expectation of privacy in the computer storage system of a surveillance video system showing where he committed … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on OH2: Part owner of a business didn’t have standing to challenge seizure of surveillance DVR with video of him committing assault

W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

“Though Defendant may have had an ‘ongoing and meaningful connection to [Zotigh’s] home as a social guest’ at certain times prior to the searches, Zotigh’s termination of their relationship, her refusal to allow Defendant to stay in her mobile home … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

Defendant gave his passwords to his computer and Facebook to his victim. Her searches are not Fourth Amendment violations. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169622 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 1, 2019). The state’s admission on appeal that they … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

D.Neb.: Violation of an ATF regulation during administrative search of an FFL doesn’t justify suppression without a 4A violation

Defendant had a federal firearms dealer license and he was subjected to an inspection. Firearms dealers, of course, are closely regulated businesses. After the motion to suppress was denied, he decided that ATF regulations were violated. The court concludes, based … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Violation of an ATF regulation during administrative search of an FFL doesn’t justify suppression without a 4A violation

D.Mont.: Def’s VA disability rating medical exam wasn’t a violation of the 4A

Defendant received VA benefits for 100% disability. A follow-up visit was required to verify and he failed to show. As a result, it was downgraded to 70% which was a loss of about 3/4ths of his benefits. He was told … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s VA disability rating medical exam wasn’t a violation of the 4A

E.D.Va.: Def doesn’t lose REP in cell phone by loaning it out while he’s in jail

The government obtained defendant’s cell phone from somebody else using it while he was in jail, and they sought a search warrant which was denied. Later they searched the phone and claimed defendant had no standing. The court finds defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Def doesn’t lose REP in cell phone by loaning it out while he’s in jail

D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

The car that was searched was being hauled by a car carrier. By turning over a car to a car hauler, the car hauler has complete possession and actual and apparent authority to consent to a search, and the person … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

Legal Intelligencer: In Fight Over Nanny Cam Footage, Pa. Justices to Wrestle With Privacy Under Wiretap Law

Legal Intelligencer: In Fight Over Nanny Cam Footage, Pa. Justices to Wrestle With Privacy Under Wiretap Law by Zack Needles:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Legal Intelligencer: In Fight Over Nanny Cam Footage, Pa. Justices to Wrestle With Privacy Under Wiretap Law