Category Archives: Exclusionary rule

WA: Second SW for records already produced was independent source; exclusionary rule won’t be applied

Verizon produced phone records under a court order, that later was determined to be invalid. A second order was issued for the same records. Verizon didn’t produce those records the second time because the first had been produced and they … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Independent source | Comments Off on WA: Second SW for records already produced was independent source; exclusionary rule won’t be applied

GA: Allegedly illegally seized journals the state agreed not to use could be used as prior inconsistent statements when def testified

Defendant’s journals were allegedly illegally seized, and the state agreed not to use them. Defendant testified, and the state sought to put the journals into evidence for impeachment as a prior inconsistent statement. When the trial court allowed it, defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Protective sweep | Comments Off on GA: Allegedly illegally seized journals the state agreed not to use could be used as prior inconsistent statements when def testified

S.D.Cal.: If you’re suing over a SW issued on false allegations, somebody has to put the SW papers in the MSJ pleadings; nobody did, so denied

This is an excessive force and illegal search claim where plaintiff claimed her husband was unreasonable killed in violation of the Fourth Amendment and state law. It also included a claim that the search warrant was obtained by judicial deception. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Conflict of laws, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: If you’re suing over a SW issued on false allegations, somebody has to put the SW papers in the MSJ pleadings; nobody did, so denied

W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

The officer pulled up behind defendant’s parked car. “[T]he Court concludes that the officers pulling up behind the parked vehicle constituted a mere encounter that did not ripen into a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes until Sergeant Spangler ordered Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

“We hold that when a probationer gives a false name to a police officer, and a record check of that name fails to reveal that the probationer is in fact subject to a search condition, the probationer is estopped from … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You

WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You by Joe Palazzolo: The digital age has accelerated carve-outs to a concept that most Americans take for granted: that evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution can’t be used against … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You

DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings. Surveying law from other states, some recognize a bad faith exception for probation searches, but this case … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

KS: Waiting to run criminal history check unreasonably extended stop; drug dog used during that time

The stop was unreasonably extended by waiting several minutes to run a criminal history which was not for safety reasons. While the criminal history check was being run, a drug dog was run around the car. The exclusionary rule applies … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: Waiting to run criminal history check unreasonably extended stop; drug dog used during that time

C.D.Ill.: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release. United States v. Phillips, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25603 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 2018). Defendant’s 2255 Fourth Amendment IAC claim wasn’t timely: “Petitioner’s motion to vacate was not filed … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release

D.D.C.: Messages through Airbnb’s website and app are governed by ECPA

A search warrant under ECPA to Airbnb was granted. Through its website and app, Airbnb allows messaging, and that makes it subject to ECPA. The government needs to determine which part of this can be unsealed to not compromise an … Continue reading

Posted in ECPA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Messages through Airbnb’s website and app are governed by ECPA

E.D.Mich.: It’s not prosecutorial misconduct to present evidence allegedly unlawfully seized to a GJ

It’s not prosecutorial misconduct to present evidence allegedly unlawfully seized to a grand jury. That was settled in Calandra in 1974. United States v. Boston, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23751 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 2018). “Accordingly, the court finds that … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: It’s not prosecutorial misconduct to present evidence allegedly unlawfully seized to a GJ

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly? by Richard Re:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?

E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing

The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing. United States v. Carrillo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21731 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. 9, 2018):

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary doesn’t apply at sentencing

MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil eviction

The landlord was changing all the locks in an apartment complex for uniformity and warned the tenants. They showed up at defendant’s apartment and knocked, but defendant didn’t answer. They tried unlocking the door but the master key didn’t work. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil eviction

NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

Police discovered defendant may have been involved in a quadruple homicide, and they submitted an exigent circumstances request for his CSLI for the four days around the homicide, and that put him there. His motion to suppress the CSLI was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

N.D.Ill.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil case

The FTC moved for a preliminary injunction and appointment of a receiver which was granted on an emergency basis. Defendants now claim a Fourth Amendment violation from seizure of records. The claim is waived by not raising it sooner. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil case

Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches by Damon Root Why illegally obtained evidence is generally inadmissible in court.

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

CA1: Exclusionary rule as to a statement won’t be applied to military disciplinary review board case

In a military disciplinary case, the court holds that a statement obtained without warnings could still be used before a disciplinary review board because the exclusionary rule is disfavored. Sasen v. Spencer, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 517 (1st Cir. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Exclusionary rule as to a statement won’t be applied to military disciplinary review board case

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches by Damon Root:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and Illegal Government Searches

PA: Even if HIPAA violated (it wasn’t), there’s no exclusionary remedy

Defendant’s medical records from the state he was extradited from were not unlawfully obtained under HIPAA or the Uniform Act for Obtaining Witnesses from Without State. A “subpoena” under the act includes subpoenas duces tecum. Moreover, even if HIPAA had … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on PA: Even if HIPAA violated (it wasn’t), there’s no exclusionary remedy