SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly? by Richard Re:

Dahda v. United States arguably poses a clash between two of the Supreme Court’s recent passions: strict adherence to statutory texts and cutting back on the exclusionary rule. This tension is unusual because the court’s exclusionary-rule decisions typically involve Fourth Amendment violations. By contrast, this case involves Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. And that statute contains an explicit exclusionary rule.

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.