CA1: Exclusionary rule as to a statement won’t be applied to military disciplinary review board case

In a military disciplinary case, the court holds that a statement obtained without warnings could still be used before a disciplinary review board because the exclusionary rule is disfavored. Sasen v. Spencer, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 517 (1st Cir. Jan. 9, 2018).

The officer’s mistake of law here was reasonable, and it still supported reasonable suspicion on the totality. Thus, the 20 minute extension of the stop was reasonable. United States v. Jenkins, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3332 (W.D. N.Y. Jan. 9, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.