Cal.App., LA: Accepting deferred entry of judgment denies a statutory right to appeal denial of suppression motion

Having accepted deferred entry of judgment to resolve his criminal case, defendant had no statutory right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. People v. Cortez, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 891 (App.Div. Los Angeles Sept. 14, 2017).

The search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable under law at the time it happened in 2009, so the motion to suppress won’t be granted. United States v. Williams, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168371 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.