Category Archives: Issue preclusion

NY Kings: 911 call 6 dogs in Manhattan apt were uncared for not exigency for warrantless entry

“Upon a review of the record, we find that the evidence adduced at the hearing did not establish the existence of facts sufficient to provide the police officer with reasonable grounds to believe that an emergency existed which required the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on NY Kings: 911 call 6 dogs in Manhattan apt were uncared for not exigency for warrantless entry

NY Nassau: 14 days pole camera surveillance of def’s residence not unreasonable under 4A or state constitution

Pole camera surveillance of a homeless shelter for 14 days observing defendant coming and going was not an unreasonable search under the state or federal constitution, even if it was his home. People v. Destefano, 2022 NY Slip Op 22052, … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on NY Nassau: 14 days pole camera surveillance of def’s residence not unreasonable under 4A or state constitution

CA4: Exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of Posse Comitatus Act

An investigation by the DoD Inspector General is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. Besides, a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is not subject to the exclusionary rule. United States v. Vaxima, Inc., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 5315 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA4: Exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of Posse Comitatus Act

OR: Questioning motorist about tattoos unreasonably extended stop

A question to a motorist about tattoos during a stop because they might have been prison tattoos wasn’t shown to be related to officer safety and was thus unreasonable. “Here, the circuitous, propensity-based inquiry about defendant’s incarceration history was predicated … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Curtilage, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Questioning motorist about tattoos unreasonably extended stop

S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

A governmental actor taking a child from the home is determined under the Fourth Amendment if substantive due process does not apply. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000, 1017-18 (7th Cir. 2000). H.P. v. Kelley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

IA: PC to search a car is not per se PC to search the driver; more is needed

Probable cause to search a car under the automobile exception does not automatically give probable cause to search the person of the driver. It depends on the facts. State v. Stevens, 2022 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 13 (Feb. 18, 2022). Temporarily … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: PC to search a car is not per se PC to search the driver; more is needed

CA6: Govt’s failure to argue standing below was mere “forfeiture” not “waiver”

The government can raise lack of standing for the first time on appeal unless it waived it below. At any rate, it can be reviewed for plain error. This also happened in United States v. Noble, 762 F.3d 509, 526-28 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Govt’s failure to argue standing below was mere “forfeiture” not “waiver”

W.D.Wis.: Guest of an overnight guest had standing, even where owner didn’t know

The guest of an overnight guest on the premises of the owner but without the owner’s knowledge had standing. “Defendants contend that Furdge had no legitimate privacy interest because he was in the home temporarily, lacked Rundle’s knowledge or consent, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Guest of an overnight guest had standing, even where owner didn’t know

W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

Defendant’s resisting his arrest, including a search warrant, was a factor in denying release pending trial. United States v. Wagoner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232 (W.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2022). Questions of fact exist on whether plaintiff’s forced digital rectal exam … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Issue preclusion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in pawnshop records uploaded for the NYPD pawnshop detail. (Therefore, in the trial of this case, attacking the datamining of the NYPD for information is more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403.) Gem … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

Plaintiff’s guilty plea in federal court was a waiver of his Fourth Amendment claims, and that was not judicial estoppel to a § 1983 case over the merits. Moreover, because the independent source doctrine was involved, the Heck bar did … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

A prosecutor is absolutely immune in presenting search warrant applications to a court. Miller v. Rivas, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22754 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2022). The affidavit for search warrant here was based on probable cause. The executing officers waited … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

The search of defendant’s car was the product of an illegal arrest, and the state fails to prove the independent source doctrine applies. Here, it was argued to be a parole search. People v. Smith, 2022 NY Slip Op 00790, … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in two months of pole camera surveillance of his business front door. Society would not recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy of what’s visible from the public street. United States v. Harry, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pole cameras, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived

The specifics of defendant’s argument that his bag was handled on a Greyhound Bus in Albuquerque weren’t raised in the district court. His expansion of the issue on appeal was waived. United States v. Fernandez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

Plaintiff operated a gym entered by the police for an administrative search during Covid when it should have been temporarily closed under a state executive order. They accessed it with a keycard from the prior owner who sold it years … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

“Paraphrased, this amounts to arguing that if the state courts got the Fourth Amendment issues really wrong, the habeas court can put Stone aside and decide the merits of the Fourth Amendment claims. [¶] Hashi cites no authority in support … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

Plaintiff sued a prosecutor for various things including the “privacy tort ‘of unreasonable intrusion into private facts.’” His computer was searched under a warrant and potential privileged material was obtained. Plaintiff’s own complaint says the prosecutor was given the information … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

Plaintiff is an attorney pro se alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation in Colorado against a member of the House of Representatives for the January 6th insurrection. He claims a Fourth Amendment in the “people’s house” when he doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there