Author Archives: Hall

Salt Lake Tribune: DEA wants to block ACLU of Utah from prescription drug database suit

Salt Lake Tribune: DEA wants to block ACLU of Utah from prescription drug database suit by Lindsay Whitehurst:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Salt Lake Tribune: DEA wants to block ACLU of Utah from prescription drug database suit

D.N.M.: CA10 recognizes blanket suppression for a “general search,” but this doesn’t measure up; “excessive photographing” not violation of 4A

Defendant doesn’t adequately explain why complete suppression is required for the search being allegedly excessive. It is a remedy under United States v. Medlin, 842 F.2d 1194 (10th Cir. 1988), when the officers’ search is overly excessive, but this just … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.N.M.: CA10 recognizes blanket suppression for a “general search,” but this doesn’t measure up; “excessive photographing” not violation of 4A

E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order can’t be issued by state judge

A Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order was issued by a state court judge when a USMJ was unavailable. The court finds state judges can issue search warrant but not tracking orders, and the Advisory Committee notes made that clear. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order can’t be issued by state judge

AK: Implied consent law doesn’t prohibit blood test SW

“[T]he district court erred when it interpreted Alaska’s implied consent law as restricting the court’s authority to issue a search warrant for a chemical test of a person’s blood upon a proper showing of probable cause. We therefore reverse the … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on AK: Implied consent law doesn’t prohibit blood test SW

D.Utah: True hot pursuit was shown for entry into def’s apartment

Defendant was wanted and he fled from a traffic stop to an apartment building. In hot pursuit, officers narrowed down the search to one of four on the top floor and cracked the door looking for him. The court concludes … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Utah: True hot pursuit was shown for entry into def’s apartment

ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

When the officer came to defendant’s house, he said he was looking for another person, and asked defendant to move back. A reasonable person in his position would not have felt free to leave. Thus, when defendant was confronted outside … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Officer telling defendant to set aside because he was looking for a man with a warrant was not a seizure

CA11: QI denied for entry into house without exigency and Tasering plaintiff

Qualified immunity properly denied for entry into house without exigent circumstances and Tasering plaintiff. “Although George may have had arguable probable cause to arrest Bratt for battery, we cannot find that, as a matter of law, that George was permitted … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: QI denied for entry into house without exigency and Tasering plaintiff

the intercept: Leaked Catalogue Reveals a Vast Array of Military Spy Gear Offered to U.S. Police

the intercept: Leaked Catalogue Reveals a Vast Array of Military Spy Gear Offered to U.S. Police by Sam Biddle: A confidential, 120-page catalogue of spy equipment, originating from British defense firm Cobham and circulated to U.S. law enforcement, touts gear … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on the intercept: Leaked Catalogue Reveals a Vast Array of Military Spy Gear Offered to U.S. Police

Wired: How Baltimore Became America’s Laboratory for Spy Tech

Wired: How Baltimore Became America’s Laboratory for Spy Tech by Lily Hay Newman: If you live in Baltimore, you may have the feeling that you’re being watched. You are. Baltimore Police track your cellphone use without a warrant. They secretly … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: How Baltimore Became America’s Laboratory for Spy Tech

PA: Letter from def in jail ended up at DA’s office already opened; private search

Defendant’s motion to suppress was delivered to the DA’s office by an unknown person in an envelope along with another already opened envelope inside that contained a letter from defendant in the jail to his girl friend encouraging witnesses to … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on PA: Letter from def in jail ended up at DA’s office already opened; private search

W.D.La.: RS of drug trafficking here not “rocket science”

Defendant was a passenger in a car asserting no interest in it or the contents. “Diaz never responded to the Government’s standing argument, even after he was given an opportunity to file a post-hearing supplemental brief.” He’d also lose on … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.La.: RS of drug trafficking here not “rocket science”

W.D.Tenn.: Order to execute on civil default judgment satisfied the warrant clause

The sheriff’s office entered defendant’s home to execute on a civil judgment for attorneys fees in a domestic matter obtained by a default judgment. Firearms were found, but he was a prohibited person. The civil process was a court order … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Order to execute on civil default judgment satisfied the warrant clause

D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ

When making a Franks challenge to the USMJ, defendant must come forward with the information then, not on the request for review to the USDJ. “The Magistrate Judge did not state on the record his specific reasoning for a finding … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ

M.D.N.C.: In 4A IAC claim, defendant has to show standing in detail and vague allegations aren’t enough

Defendant’s IAC claim here depends on his having standing. His vague allegations of standing aren’t enough. Organes-Espino v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113536 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2016). The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant had been driving under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: In 4A IAC claim, defendant has to show standing in detail and vague allegations aren’t enough

OR: Horse owner didn’t lose privacy interest in horses being cared for by another on other’s property

Third-party property owners who were boarding defendant’s horses had the actual authority to consent to the sheriff’s entry onto their properties. Defendant didn’t have any authority to exclude the owners from particular parts of the properties where her horses stayed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Horse owner didn’t lose privacy interest in horses being cared for by another on other’s property

fivethirtyeight.com: Internet Tracking Has Moved Beyond Cookies

fivethirtyeight.com: Internet Tracking Has Moved Beyond Cookies by Jody Avirgan:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on fivethirtyeight.com: Internet Tracking Has Moved Beyond Cookies

TX13: Where charged with failure to identify, the lawfulness of the detention can’t be determined by a motion to suppress

Where defendant was charged with failure to identify herself when lawfully detained, this court is bound by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Woods that a motion to suppress can’t be used to litigate the lawfulness of the initial detention. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof | Comments Off on TX13: Where charged with failure to identify, the lawfulness of the detention can’t be determined by a motion to suppress

W.D.Ark.: No QI for officer extending a traffic stop for a drug dog w/o RS

Officer was not entitled to qualified immunity for allegedly extending a traffic stop without reasonable suspicion just to conduct a dog sniff. Gover v. Helder, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117417 (W.D.Ark. July 29, 2016). Defendant’s call from book-in jail phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: No QI for officer extending a traffic stop for a drug dog w/o RS

VI: Nervousness is not RS; patdown unjustified and no reason shown

Defendant’s stop was admittedly justified, but the detention was without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Mere nervousness isn’t enough, and the officer didn’t articulate more. A patdown was unreasonable. People v. Hodge, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 123 (Aug. 24, 2016). Defendant showed … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on VI: Nervousness is not RS; patdown unjustified and no reason shown

MA: That CI’s tip in another case wasn’t good enough doesn’t say much about this one where it was more detailed and better corroborated

The CI’s tip here was detailed and substantially corroborated. As to the CI’s track record, a search was suppressed on his information after this one occurred, but that doesn’t ipso facto impugn his credibility. In the other case, the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Search, Standing | Comments Off on MA: That CI’s tip in another case wasn’t good enough doesn’t say much about this one where it was more detailed and better corroborated