Author Archives: Hall

WV: GSR removal subject to search incident–no SW required

Taking gunshot residue without a warrant incident to arrest is reasonable because it disappears so fast. [The court analogizes blood alcohol, but GSR can disappear easily within minutes, simply by putting one’s hands in pockets or rubbing hands together.] State … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on WV: GSR removal subject to search incident–no SW required

CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

Under Georgia law, a DNA sample from a first offender should be expunged from the system when he completes his probation or sentence. This one wasn’t. Whatever the statute says, it doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hinton, … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress under the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement because the trial court’s finding that the detective’s intrusion onto the curtilage was justified for officer safety was not supported by … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim

Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Gibson, 2017-Ohio-102, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 107 (8th Dist. Jan 12, 2017). Defendant was stopped for swerving on the highway. When he … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is a waiver of a 4A claim

IN: Cell phone photograph of SW sent to officer’s phone satisfied the statute for officer to have warrant for search

The officer here needed a search warrant for defendant’s blood for suspicion of DUI. When the warrant was issued, a photograph of it was sent to his cell phone. Defendant objected to the form of the warrant claiming that it … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone photograph of SW sent to officer’s phone satisfied the statute for officer to have warrant for search

D.Kan.: Sony’s reports of CP on def’s Playstation3 to NCMEC was a private search

Users of Sony’s PlayStation3 communicate with each other through Sony’s PlayStation Network, like email. Sony in its terms of service prohibits transfer of illegal things, and it reserves the right to monitor. Also, 18 U.S.C. § 2258 makes Sony a … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Sony’s reports of CP on def’s Playstation3 to NCMEC was a private search

W.D.Mo.: Entry into the curtilage was justified by exigency of a shots fired call

Defendant’s next door neighbor called 911 to report shots fired at defendant’s house. When they arrived, officers set up a perimeter and entry into the curtilage was valid based on exigency, and a cartridge case was seen in plain view. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Entry into the curtilage was justified by exigency of a shots fired call

E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

Defendant was stopped for his tag light being out, and it resulted in finding that his DL was suspended. That meant that his vehicle would be towed. The inventory by all appearances was starting, because a video showed the inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

Two on informant hearsay

The CI provided detailed information that all proved to be true involving a shipment of drugs, down to the packaging. While the automobile exception would have supported the search, the police obtained a warrant on the probable cause from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Tagged | Comments Off on Two on informant hearsay

NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

Defendant abandons his argument that there was no reasonable suspicion for his stop by providing no argument on reasonable suspicion and instead focusing on probable cause. Going to the record, however, the court finds reasonable suspicion for the stop because … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on NC: Def waived issue of RS for appeal by arguing PC instead; on merits, there was RS anyway

LA4: Search incident for curfew violation arrest was reasonable

An arrest of a juvenile for even the minor offense of a curfew violation justified a search incident when the juvenile was placed in the police car. State ex rel. R.M., 2017 La. App. LEXIS 68 (La.App. 4 Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA4: Search incident for curfew violation arrest was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

State officers obtained a search warrant for defendant’s property which they held but was being used in a federal prosecution. Rule 41(g) does not enable the defendant to get return of property held by state officials even though there is … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: When state officers seize and hold property in federal case, return of property under Rule 41(g) not possible

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

W.D.Va.: Leaving cell phone outside fed courthouse under ashtray, where CSOs commonly recommended hiding phones, was a waiver of REP in phone, albeit not abandonment

Defendant came to the federal courthouse because his mother was being arrested, and DHS officers invited him there. He did not know that he had an arrest warrant, too. When he got to the courthouse, he was told he couldn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Leaving cell phone outside fed courthouse under ashtray, where CSOs commonly recommended hiding phones, was a waiver of REP in phone, albeit not abandonment

E.D.Mich.: Sex trafficking a minor in a hotel room was exigency for warrantless entry on PC

Defendant rented his hotel room under a known alias of his for which he had an ID card. That gave him standing. The exigency of sex trafficking a minor justified the officer’s warrantless entry, and it’s apparent there was probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Sex trafficking a minor in a hotel room was exigency for warrantless entry on PC

WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

“¶17 We agree with [State v. Jardinez, 184 Wn. App. 518, 338 P.3d 292 (2014)] that the [Sentencing Guidelines] Commission’s comment is strong evidence that the legislature intended that there must be a nexus between the suspected violation and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question by John Ribeiro: The company has objected in a lawsuit to unreasonable US government requests for customer data

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question

VA: While def didn’t have standing as to whole car, he did in the space immediately around him, relying on Jones GPS case

Defendant passenger was removed from a car after a traffic stop, and the officer with the defendant directed another to look for what he thought was a gun, which the other officer found. Defendant was held not to have standing … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on VA: While def didn’t have standing as to whole car, he did in the space immediately around him, relying on Jones GPS case

WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks

WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks by Orin Kerr: The Harvard Law Library recently posted a neat 46-minute interview of Justice Felix Frankfurter from the early 1960s. Frankfurter, who is interviewed by Professor Paul Freund, speaks about legal education, the role of … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice Frankfurter speaks

E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable

This email search warrant sought specific information over a several year period, and the Google production was somewhat limited yet still substantial. Yet, included were emails between attorney and client and there were no search protocols. The court declines to … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable