Author Archives: Hall

CA1: Misstatement Alpha-PVP was in package instead of Alpha-PHP was not material nor in bad faith

The affidavit for search warrant was based on a customs search of a package destined for delivery in Maine that the contents was Alpha-PVP, which is how it looked and field tested as MDMA. Later lab analysis showed it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: Misstatement Alpha-PVP was in package instead of Alpha-PHP was not material nor in bad faith

CA11: Shooting of ptf during drug raid was reasonable and subject to QI

This § 1983 case arose from a shooting death by police during execution of a drug search warrant. The pre-search briefing told the officers that the suspect inside was involved in drug dealing and was likely armed, so a no-knock … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting of ptf during drug raid was reasonable and subject to QI

IA: Def plead guilty and later overruling of case law suggested the stop was unreasonable; no IAC claim on direct appeal

An LPN check showed the 77 year old owner of the car had an expired DL. When the officer encountered the driver, it was obviously not the owner because of age. It was the owner’s daughter. The officer shortly determined … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Def plead guilty and later overruling of case law suggested the stop was unreasonable; no IAC claim on direct appeal

CA1: 82 minute stop was with RS

Reasonable suspicion developed from defendants’ stop to extend it for 82 minutes. United States v. Ramdihall, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8727 (1st Cir. May 18, 2017).* Defendant was stopped by police after getting off Amtrak at Minot ND. A great … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: 82 minute stop was with RS

TX4: Conversation over fence with officer led to consent

The conversation with the officers led to a consent search. There were no weapons shown or coercion, and officers had a fence between them and the defendant. Anthony v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 4478 (Tex. App. – San Antonio … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on TX4: Conversation over fence with officer led to consent

CA11: A police dog can’t be sued for excessive force under § 1983 or for negligence under state law

A police dog can’t be sued under § 1983, although the handler can. Here, the handler has qualified immunity for this use of force. Jones v. Fransen, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8816 (11th Cir. May 19, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: A police dog can’t be sued for excessive force under § 1983 or for negligence under state law

IA: Plain view of a baggie is enough to seize it without also knowing that there are drugs in it

Plain view of a plastic baggie is enough to seize it without also knowing that there are drugs in it. State v. Taylor, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 517 (May 17, 2017). Defendant’s speeding and his condition was reasonable suspicion for … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Plain view of a baggie is enough to seize it without also knowing that there are drugs in it

NYLJ: Computer Searches: A ‘General’ Warrant Can No Longer Satisfy Requirements

NYLJ: Computer Searches: A ‘General’ Warrant Can No Longer Satisfy Requirements by Roger L. Stavis (May 19, 2017):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, General warrant | Comments Off on NYLJ: Computer Searches: A ‘General’ Warrant Can No Longer Satisfy Requirements

HI imposes triggering condition in anticipatory warrants under state constitution

“We are faced with a question of first impression for this court: Does the Hawai’i Constitution require that an anticipatory search warrant identify the triggering condition on the face of the warrant? In light of the privacy protections contained in … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, State constitution | Comments Off on HI imposes triggering condition in anticipatory warrants under state constitution

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s prior drug involvement justified a drug search condition on supervised release

Defendant’s prior convictions for drugs from age 17-22 justified a drug search condition on supervised release. United States v. Betsy-Jones, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75157 (N.D. N.Y. April 28, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74113 (N.D. N.Y. May 16, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s prior drug involvement justified a drug search condition on supervised release

M.D.Pa.: Def’s version in pro se motion to suppress used against him in third on credibility

Defendant files three motions to suppress. The first one was pro se and never mentioned that his stop was pretextual, that the headlights were actually on, and the stop was without reasonable suspicion. A later motion to suppress challenged the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def’s version in pro se motion to suppress used against him in third on credibility

Cal.4th: Passenger’s parole status permitted search of entire passenger compartment

Defendant was in a car with a parolee. After a valid stop, the parolee gave a false name, and the officer eventually got the right name and parole status. A search of the whole car was permissible even though the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Passenger’s parole status permitted search of entire passenger compartment

S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure during SW wasn’t so bad this was a general search

In a forfeiture case of a building worth about $1B, the good faith exception applies to a prior search where there was an overseizure. This overseizure wasn’t enough to make the search a general search. In re 650 Fifth Ave. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, General warrant, Good faith exception, Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure during SW wasn’t so bad this was a general search

E.D.Pa.: Def saw police car and walked to other side of street, dropped his gun, and came back to submit to police, and that was abandonment

“Defendant unequivocally intended to abandon the firearm. After the patrol car was near the scene, Defendant walked away from it. While walking, Defendant bent down next to a parked vehicle on Pacific Street and dropped a metallic object on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def saw police car and walked to other side of street, dropped his gun, and came back to submit to police, and that was abandonment

NC statute that probation search be for “purpose” of probation is a limitation on the search power

A 2009 amendment to the state probation search condition required that the search serve the purpose of the supervision, so it’s not carte blanche for a probation search. The trial court’s order refusing to suppress is reversed. State v. Powell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC statute that probation search be for “purpose” of probation is a limitation on the search power

WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both?

WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on WaPo: Is voluntariness of consent to search or seize a question of fact, law or both?

WA: Implied consent law now includes testing for THC influenced driving, and it’s constitutional

The implied consent law includes testing for THC concentration, and it is constitutional. Kandler v. City of Kent, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 1176 (May 15, 2017). Officers adequately explained date discrepancies in the paperwork and use of a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WA: Implied consent law now includes testing for THC influenced driving, and it’s constitutional

OH5: Def without DL and not on rental agreement as authorized driver had no standing

Defendant never had a DL, and he was driving a rental car and wasn’t on the paperwork as an authorized driver, so the renter had no authority to let him drive. Therefore, he lacked standing. State v. Nicholson, 2017-Ohio-2825, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH5: Def without DL and not on rental agreement as authorized driver had no standing

Hacked again

WordPress has been updated, and it’s acting a little funny. But at least it’s working again. Getting phishing reports that tell us of the hacks. We do this whole operation on a shoestring since there is no income from it, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Hacked again

techdirt: Appeals Court Pretty Sure DOJ Use-Of-Force Guidelines Don’t Violate Police Officers’ 2nd And 4th Amendment Rights

techdirt: Appeals Court Pretty Sure DOJ Use-Of-Force Guidelines Don’t Violate Police Officers’ 2nd And 4th Amendment Rights by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court Pretty Sure DOJ Use-Of-Force Guidelines Don’t Violate Police Officers’ 2nd And 4th Amendment Rights