Author Archives: Hall

GA: Std of review: If video clear, it controls on its facts and gets de novo review

Defendant was stopped for driving a motorcycle without a helmet, and alcohol was on his breath. The objective facts from the video show the FST and breath test were consensual. “And, where, as here, the controlling facts are undisputed because … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Std of review: If video clear, it controls on its facts and gets de novo review

OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served

Oral testimony in support of issuance of a search warrant did not have to be transcribed and made part of the record before the warrant was served. State v. Wilson, 2017-Ohio-5484, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2544 (3d Dist. June 26, … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served

CA7: Plaintiff’s 4A claim was too generalized to state a claim

In a bankruptcy appeal, the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim was too generalized to state a claim. Home Care Providers v. Hemmelgarn, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11412 (7th Cir. June 27, 2017):

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on CA7: Plaintiff’s 4A claim was too generalized to state a claim

S.D.Cal.: Google’s email search scanning for CP was a private search; DHS’s separate search was “not a significant expansion”

Google’s scanning of email for child pornography is a private search. The DHS review of defendant’s emails wasn’t a significant expansion of the private search. United States v. Wilson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98432 (S.D. Cal. June 26, 2017):

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Google’s email search scanning for CP was a private search; DHS’s separate search was “not a significant expansion”

N.D.Fla.: Entry onto 3-4 acre plot for knock-and-talk lawfully entered curtilage

Defendant lived on a 3-4 acre plot, and police lawfully entered through an open gate to conduct a knock-and-talk at defendant’s door. Exactly where the curtilage ends isn’t clear, but it certainly was close to the house where they were. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Entry onto 3-4 acre plot for knock-and-talk lawfully entered curtilage

E.D.Ky.: Google not a state actor when it scans email for CP and reports it

Google scans all its email for child porn hash values, examines those that are suspect, and reports it to NCMEC. Neither Google nor NCMEC are government actors. United States v. Miller, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97383 (E.D. Ky. May 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Google not a state actor when it scans email for CP and reports it

NYTimes: Why We Shouldn’t Drug Test Poor People

NYTimes: Why We Shouldn’t Drug Test Poor People by Jamila Michener and Julilly Kohler-Hausmann President Trump with Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin this month. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times The Senate Republicans’ stalled effort to repeal the Affordable Care … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NYTimes: Why We Shouldn’t Drug Test Poor People

GA: A field sobriety test is not a “search”

A field sobriety test is not a “search,” recognizing authorities to the contrary. Mitchell v. State, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 545 (June 26, 2017):

Posted in Search | Comments Off on GA: A field sobriety test is not a “search”

Forbes: The DOJ Wants To Take Away Online Privacy. And A Court Says Okay

Forbes: The DOJ Wants To Take Away Online Privacy. And A Court Says Okay by Frank Miniter:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Forbes: The DOJ Wants To Take Away Online Privacy. And A Court Says Okay

D.Kan.: Email and computer SWs were necessarily broad, but not unreasonably broad

“These were not warrants to search for ‘any and all information’ or ‘all computer information’ in defendant’s house. See Christie, 717 F.3d at 1165. Rather, the attachments effectively limited the scope of the searches to material relevant to specific federal … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, E-mail, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Email and computer SWs were necessarily broad, but not unreasonably broad

NYTimes: Jurors Find Video Isn’t Providing 20/20 Vision in Police Shootings

NYTimes: Jurors Find Video Isn’t Providing 20/20 Vision in Police Shootings by Julie Bosman, Mitch Smith, and Michael Wines: Since the 2014 shooting death of Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson, Mo. – a shooting that was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NYTimes: Jurors Find Video Isn’t Providing 20/20 Vision in Police Shootings

NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing

NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing by Peter J. Henning:

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing

SCOTUS avoids deciding El Paso cross border shooting case and remands to CA5

The El Paso-Ciudad Juarez cross border shooting case remanded by SCOTUS to the Fifth Circuit for reconsideration in light of a decision from the Court on June 19th on whether Bivens applies. Hernández v. Mesa, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4059 (June … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS avoids deciding El Paso cross border shooting case and remands to CA5

CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Intervenors showed no Art. III standing to challenge the DEA’s administrative subpoenas to the Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Art. III standing requires that they show independent standing to sue. Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material

Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material by Hannah Parry:

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material

D.N.M.: GPS tracking warrants can be issued by USMJs; Title III doesn’t apply

The GPS tracking warrants were issued by a USMJ, and Title III’s restriction on only USDJs issuing wiretaps doesn’t apply tracking warrants [which are specifically mentioned in Rule 41]. The tracking did not exceed the 45 day limitation in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, F.R.Crim.P. 41, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on D.N.M.: GPS tracking warrants can be issued by USMJs; Title III doesn’t apply

E.D.Wis.: Def’s stop was without RS, and body cam video showed it

Milwaukee bike patrol officers heard a gun drop on the street and approached the people around the sound. Only another one walked away as shown in the officer’s body cam. The officers approached defendant, but there was no reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Def’s stop was without RS, and body cam video showed it

CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

District Court [inexplicably] granted CoA for appeal of Wisconsin planting a GPS device a year before Jones which the state court of appeals held was saved by Davis good faith exception. State v. Oberst, 2014 WI App 58, 354 Wis. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

AZ: Hot pursuit justified for minor offenses

Police attempted to stop defendant for a vehicle registration violation, but he didn’t stop and gave probable cause to believe he was fleeing the stop. He drove into his private driveway with a police car right behind him and went … Continue reading →

Posted in Hot pursuit | Comments Off on AZ: Hot pursuit justified for minor offenses

RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

The person asked for consent didn’t live there, and the officers made no attempt to find out whether she did. They just assumed she did. The state’s alternative argument of exigency is rejected because the officers never testified to any … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t