Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Supervised release warrantless computer search condition isn’t limited to sex offenses

Defendant was convicted of aggravated child abuse, but not a sex offense, in state court, and that resulted in revocation of supervised release. The new sentence was 24 months confinement and 36 months supervised release. A warrantless computer search condition … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Supervised release warrantless computer search condition isn’t limited to sex offenses

CA6: Moving to withdraw plea after three months because “there were technical issues with his arrest warrant” is denied; not a ground for relief

Defendant moved to withdraw his plea three months later because “there were technical issues with his arrest warrant.” “Further, Miller never asserted his innocence, which also weighs against granting the motion. He argued only that he should be permitted to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA6: Moving to withdraw plea after three months because “there were technical issues with his arrest warrant” is denied; not a ground for relief

WaPo: House Intelligence Committee passes spy-bill renewal, but on party lines

WaPo: House Intelligence Committee passes spy-bill renewal, but on party lines by Karoun Demirjian: The House Intelligence Committee passed a bill Friday to restrain the government’s access to data collected under a powerful authority to collect foreign intelligence on U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on WaPo: House Intelligence Committee passes spy-bill renewal, but on party lines

OH2: Two on nonconsensual encounters: one in an ER, one on def’s own property

The officer’s encounter with defendant in the ER initially asking if he had “any drugs or weapons” was not consensual. “The trial court concluded that Officer West’s encounter was not a consensual encounter. The trial court emphasized that West approached … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH2: Two on nonconsensual encounters: one in an ER, one on def’s own property

CA7: Nolo plea after losing suppression hearing is collateral estoppel

A state multiday suppression hearing was denied, and that led to defendant’s nolo plea to the charges. Then he sued in federal court. When collateral estoppel was invoked, he argued that the plea vitiated collateral estoppel. It didn’t. Derrick v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: Nolo plea after losing suppression hearing is collateral estoppel

W.D.Mo.: Knock-and-announce didn’t apply to an open door; plain view reasonable, but wife’s consent was vitiated by threat of jail if she didn’t sign form

Officers came to defendant’s house both on a call about the welfare of children living there and with a pre-existing warrant for defendant’s arrest. They encountered one of the children outside taking trash to the street and determined that defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Knock-and-announce didn’t apply to an open door; plain view reasonable, but wife’s consent was vitiated by threat of jail if she didn’t sign form

E.D.Va.: Corrected typo on SW’s execution date was proper and didn’t void warrant

There was a typo on the warrant when created by the Magistrate. It said it had to be executed by “June 13” but it was issued after that and obviously should have said “July 13.” The error was caught by … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Corrected typo on SW’s execution date was proper and didn’t void warrant

MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved

Defendant failed to preserve his Fourth Amendment claims for appeal. You don’t get a hearing just by asking. He didn’t make a proffer in his Franks motion which was enough to deny it. Then, whatever issue was left, the defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved

CO: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident not saved by GFE because no prior case on point

Defendant’s cell phone was subjected to a pre-Riley search incident. Defendant preserved the issue, and now he prevails. The state’s reliance on Davis good faith exception fails because the case the state relies on to support good faith reliance on … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones | Comments Off on CO: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident not saved by GFE because no prior case on point

CA9: Police can enter suspect probationer’s parent’s house where she lived looking for her

Police could enter a commonly used residence to look for a probationer they had probable cause to believe committed a violent crime, over the protests of the primary occupant, her mother. They entered over the mother’s objection but didn’t find … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Police can enter suspect probationer’s parent’s house where she lived looking for her

DE: Conclusory motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s conclusory motion to suppress that states no law or fact is denied without a hearing. State v. Dunson, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 616 (July 7, 2017):

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Conclusory motion to suppress summarily denied

D.P.R.: Threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep

A threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep because he’d have to get his clothes. United States v. Rodriguez-Madera, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196636 (D. P.R. Nov. 28, 2017):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Threshold arrest of defendant in his underwear justifies a protective sweep

The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age

The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age by Alan Butler: This case will not be decided in a vacuum, and it appears that the justices appreciate both the magnitude of the moment and … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on The Hill: SCOTUS justices are ready to tackle privacy rights in the digital age

KUOW: 10,000 warrants in Seattle: Here’s a chance for some to avoid arrest

KUOW: 10,000 warrants in Seattle: Here’s a chance for some to avoid arrest by Patricia Murphy:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on KUOW: 10,000 warrants in Seattle: Here’s a chance for some to avoid arrest

Vox: “It’s been complete hell”: how police used a traffic stop to take $91,800 from an innocent man

Vox: “It’s been complete hell”: how police used a traffic stop to take $91,800 from an innocent man by German Lopez: The money was supposed to go toward buying a legendary music studio. Now his dreams are on hold.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Vox: “It’s been complete hell”: how police used a traffic stop to take $91,800 from an innocent man

The Intercept: NSA Secretly Helped Convict Defendants in U.S. Courts, Classified Documents Reveal

The Intercept: NSA Secretly Helped Convict Defendants in U.S. Courts, Classified Documents Reveal (Part 7) by Trevor Aaronson: By withholding evidence of warrantless spying, the government avoided a court challenge to controversial mass surveillance – which is now before Congress.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Intercept: NSA Secretly Helped Convict Defendants in U.S. Courts, Classified Documents Reveal

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument by Will Baude:

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Thoughts on property and positive law after the Carpenter oral argument

IL: ER blood draw was private search for diagnostic purposes

“The mere filing of a motion [to suppress] is not proof that a search occurred.” Defendant first failed to prove that he was the subject of the search. Second, even if it was assumed, the hospital took the blood draw … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Private search | Comments Off on IL: ER blood draw was private search for diagnostic purposes

MD: With decrim of <10 g. MJ, officer doesn't have to be absolutely sure of quantity to have PC

“Despite the decriminalization of possession of less than ten grams of marijuana, a law enforcement officer who has reason to believe that an individual is in possession of marijuana has probable cause to effectuate an arrest, even if the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on MD: With decrim of <10 g. MJ, officer doesn't have to be absolutely sure of quantity to have PC

E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(g) motion denied for failure to show entitlement to seized property

For Rule 41(g) motion to return property: “Flemming has failed to prove that he is a ‘person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure.’ In his motion, Flemming does not challenge the legality of the search and seizure in question. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(g) motion denied for failure to show entitlement to seized property