DE: Conclusory motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s conclusory motion to suppress that states no law or fact is denied without a hearing.
State v. Dunson, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 616 (July 7, 2017):

The Court further finds that the motion fails to state the factual and legal grounds on which it is based, and therefore, should be summarily denied. Defense counsel fails to cite a single case or statute in support of his position. Following a partial summary of the facts, the motion concludes that “[t]he foregoing facts, which consist primarily of a single controlled purchase, are insufficient to establish probable cause.” This statement is a legal conclusion rather than a legal argument. The motion’s conclusory allegations are insufficient to trigger a hearing.

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.