Author Archives: Hall

LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

In the course of a homicide investigation, the victim was shown to have last talked to defendant on his cell phone just before his murder. That led to getting his picture to show to a witness who ID’d him as … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LA1: Look in mailbox to confirm def’s address was after they’d confirmed his apartment; not unreasonable

LA2: Hearsay admissible in suppression hearings; here it was officer’s preliminary hearing testimony which showed exigency

Hearsay is admissible in a suppression hearing. The parties agreed here that the officer’s testimony at the preliminary hearing would be the basis for the suppression hearing, and it shows exigent circumstances for the entry into defendant’s home. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on LA2: Hearsay admissible in suppression hearings; here it was officer’s preliminary hearing testimony which showed exigency

CA8: The challenge to RS isn’t piece by piece; RS on totality

The police surveilled defendant’s garage where he was alleged to sell meth from his home in the early morning or at night when he was home. The totality of circumstances add up to reasonable suspicion, and defendant’s challenge was to … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: The challenge to RS isn’t piece by piece; RS on totality

CA10: The GFE question is “whether the affidavit is so facially deficient that reliance on a warrant issued in response to that affidavit cannot have been in good faith”

The question is not just probable cause; it’s whether it was reasonable for the officer to rely on a warrant that is not facially deficient. United States v. Knox, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 4791 (10th Cir. Feb. 27, 2018):

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA10: The GFE question is “whether the affidavit is so facially deficient that reliance on a warrant issued in response to that affidavit cannot have been in good faith”

E.D.Mo.: No joint venture shown with Philippines LEOs in seizure of def’s suitcase there

The search in the Philippines was not a joint venture with the United States, so the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to it. “There is no evidence that the FBI was aware that items from Defendant’s home were in the suitcase. … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No joint venture shown with Philippines LEOs in seizure of def’s suitcase there

CA10: “affidavit established a minimally sufficient nexus between the criminal activity and the place to be searched.”

“Deputy Tucker’s affidavit established a minimally sufficient nexus between the criminal activity and the place to be searched.” Therefore, the affidavit shows probable cause. “The warrant was not based on an affidavit that ‘merely states suspicions, beliefs, or conclusions.’ Roach, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: “affidavit established a minimally sufficient nexus between the criminal activity and the place to be searched.”

WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You

WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You by Joe Palazzolo: The digital age has accelerated carve-outs to a concept that most Americans take for granted: that evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution can’t be used against … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on WSJ: When Illegally Obtained Evidence Can Be Used Against You

CA10: Consent was attenuated from alleged unlawful stop despite def’s real urgency to go pee

The government proved that defendant’s consent was attentuated from the alleged unlawful detention because the paperwork during the stop was given back. The district court considered the fact defendant complained she had to pee really bad. United States v. Ramos, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on CA10: Consent was attenuated from alleged unlawful stop despite def’s real urgency to go pee

CA8: Def has burden of showing illegal detention was “but for” cause of finding evidence

Defendant was a known drug dealer, and he was parked with his hood open. He said he was checking the belt on the engine. The officer was not prohibited from approaching the car and looking under the hood, too. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: Def has burden of showing illegal detention was “but for” cause of finding evidence

M.D.Fla.: SW’s particularity had a reference back to “property connected with the above listed crime(s)” and that’s particular

Despite renting a hotel room in a false name, defendant had standing to challenge the search of the room because he rented it and he was sleeping there and had his stuff there. The search warrant was based on an … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: SW’s particularity had a reference back to “property connected with the above listed crime(s)” and that’s particular

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Justices divided over disclosure of overseas emails

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Justices divided over disclosure of overseas emails by Amy Howe:

Posted in E-mail, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Justices divided over disclosure of overseas emails

Forbes: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence

Forbes: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence by Thomas Fox-Brewster: In what appears to be a major breakthrough for law enforcement, and a possible privacy problem for Apple customers, a major U.S. government contractor claims … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Forbes: The Feds Can Now (Probably) Unlock Every iPhone Model In Existence

Daily Beast: Fitbit Could Prove a Man’s Innocence. Google Could Send Another to Prison for Murder

Daily Beast: Fitbit Could Prove a Man’s Innocence. Google Could Send Another to Prison for Murder by Kate Briquelet: A troubled boyfriend. A hard-drinking felon. And a young mom bludgeoned to death steps from her own home. Now smart technologies … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Fitbit Could Prove a Man’s Innocence. Google Could Send Another to Prison for Murder

CA7: Circumstances justified inference def’s car was getaway car in a robbery, and that was PC

There was probable cause that a getaway car was involved in a robbery. “Here, in contrast, the Mercedes’s conduct cannot be confused with innocent behavior. While it is true that police did not know the occupants of the Mercedes were … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Circumstances justified inference def’s car was getaway car in a robbery, and that was PC

CA9: Ptf refused entry to house on a domestic call, and police broke in and tasered him; grant of QI reversed

Plaintiff refused entry to the police on a domestic call. They broke in and tasered him on the floor. The district court erred in granting qualified immunity to the officers. He refused entry, which was his right, and this case … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf refused entry to house on a domestic call, and police broke in and tasered him; grant of QI reversed

D.D.C.: There’s a right of public access to old pen register and SCA orders where no ongoing investigation would be compromised

In a 102 page opinion, with the agreement of the USAO, the D.D.C. finds a limited right of access in old sealed pen register orders and SCA orders and unseals those that will not compromise ongoing investigations. There is an … Continue reading →

Posted in Common law, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on D.D.C.: There’s a right of public access to old pen register and SCA orders where no ongoing investigation would be compromised

HuffPo: Trump’s Anti-Immigration Machine Is Chipping Away At The Fourth Amendment

HuffPo: Trump’s Anti-Immigration Machine Is Chipping Away At The Fourth Amendment by Cesar Vargas: Now as president with the power to direct actions by the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees our nation’s border and immigration policies, he is exploiting … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on HuffPo: Trump’s Anti-Immigration Machine Is Chipping Away At The Fourth Amendment

NY3: Building didn’t appear to be two units; SW for def’s dwelling, he answered door, and then they saw

The search warrant’s describing the dwelling as a single family dwelling when it was really two and defendant lived on the second floor didn’t make it overbroad. It did not appear to be a multi-unit dwelling and defendant answered the … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Overbreadth | Comments Off on NY3: Building didn’t appear to be two units; SW for def’s dwelling, he answered door, and then they saw

M.D.Ga.: Defs had standing in borrowed car; no RS because defs’ answers were objectively reasonable

Defendants borrowed a car and had standing in the car because it contained personal records being transported. The stop was unreasonably extended by questions about the trip. The officer found them suspicious, but the court does not. The defendants’ answers … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Defs had standing in borrowed car; no RS because defs’ answers were objectively reasonable

W.D.Pa.: SW materials can be considered in determining whether to detain

“When considering same together with the Bond Report, the indictment, and police reports and search warrant documents, the Court alternatively finds that the Government established by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant is a danger to the community. See Perry, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW materials can be considered in determining whether to detain