Author Archives: Hall

MN: Shoplifter placed stuff in her purse, and that made it subject to search incident

Defendant was observed shoplifting and put the allegedly stolen item into her purse. Outside, a struggle ensued, and defendant handed her purse off to another. It was subject to search incident because it was evidence [and an instrumentality] of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Search incident | Comments Off on MN: Shoplifter placed stuff in her purse, and that made it subject to search incident

CA6: Ptf inmate’s bodily privacy not unreasonably violated because female guard saw him in shower

Summary judgment was properly granted against plaintiff’s prison Fourth Amendment claim that his privacy rights were violated because a female guard happened to see him in the shower. He has a limited reasonable expectation of privacy in his bodily privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf inmate’s bodily privacy not unreasonably violated because female guard saw him in shower

E.D.Pa.: Affidavit for CP didn’t show PC, but GFE still applies

The affidavit for this child pornography search warrant was conclusory as to alleged sexual activity of minors and did not show probable cause. It was, however, not so devoid of a showing that it wasn’t reasonable to rely on it … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Affidavit for CP didn’t show PC, but GFE still applies

The Champion: Breaking Blue: Challenging Police Officer Credibility at Motions to Suppress

Jennifer Sellitti, Breaking Blue: Challenging Police Officer Credibility at Motions to Suppress, 41 The Champion (No. 10) 16 (Dec. 2017):

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on The Champion: Breaking Blue: Challenging Police Officer Credibility at Motions to Suppress

FL5 following FL SCt: Davis GFE doesn’t apply to pre-Riley cell phone searches

On remand from the state supreme court, the Davis good faith exception does not apply in Florida to cell phone searches occurring before because there was no settled law, following Carpenter v. State, 228 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 2017). Burton … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on FL5 following FL SCt: Davis GFE doesn’t apply to pre-Riley cell phone searches

OH4: PC shown by inference that def had drugs in hotel room; officers don’t have to see a drug transaction to have PC

An actual drug transaction doesn’t have to happen for officers to have probable cause defendant likely had drugs in his hotel room. The investigation here developed logical inferences that’s what defendant was doing, and there was a nexus between his … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: PC shown by inference that def had drugs in hotel room; officers don’t have to see a drug transaction to have PC

W.D.N.Y.: Officers’ one minute discussion about def deciding what to do wasn’t being undiligent in pursuing their investigation

The officer here had reasonable suspicion defendant was carrying drugs, and the fact that another officer arrived and they talked about defendant for one minute didn’t show that they weren’t diligently following up in their investigation. United States v. Green, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Officers’ one minute discussion about def deciding what to do wasn’t being undiligent in pursuing their investigation

GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

Being arrested in an apartment that’s not yours doesn’t confer standing without some proof of a relationship to the property. The evidence at the suppression hearing did not address defendant’s status relative to the apartment; i.e., whether he was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

E.D.Ky.: Entry for protective sweep with gun drawn wasn’t per se a “forceful entry”; announcement unnecessary

The officer in this case did not have to knock-and-announce to make a protective sweep after defendant was arrested. The officer testified that he did. Entering with gun drawn doesn’t make it a “forceful entry.” United States v. Israel, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Entry for protective sweep with gun drawn wasn’t per se a “forceful entry”; announcement unnecessary

LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

Defendant was arrested for possession of marijuana so the search of his wallet was justified as a search incident. As a parolee, his hotel room was his “residence” for purposes of a parole search. State v. Warren, 2018 La. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

OH10: Def walking down street with a bullet magazine on belt wasn’t violating law and he could ignore officers

Defendant was walking down the street, and officers noticed he had a bullet magazine on his belt. They followed him to his residence, and he declined to talk to them and went inside. Their entry into his residence violated the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Def walking down street with a bullet magazine on belt wasn’t violating law and he could ignore officers

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge by Christopher Mimms: You are giving away more data about your location than you probably realize through the apps in your smartphone-and that data is being sold, often without your … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

S.D.Ala.: AL state requirement of recording SW application doesn’t apply to SW used in federal court

The Alabama state requirement that an application for a search warrant be recorded doesn’t apply to using the product of the search in federal court. United States v. Tensley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29979 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 26, 2018). Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: AL state requirement of recording SW application doesn’t apply to SW used in federal court

CA11: Protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside

A protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside. United States v. Ratcliff, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443 (11th Cir. Feb. 28, 2018). Officer “knocked” on defendant’s tent at a campsite to talk to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: Protective sweep was justified by an extra car out front and voices from inside

CA6: No knock entry at 4 am stated claim for unreasonable execution of SW

Plaintiffs adequately allege a claim for unreasonable execution of a search warrant. The officers executed a search warrant at 4 am without knocking or announcing, and shot the lock off the door. Greer v. City of Highland Park, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: No knock entry at 4 am stated claim for unreasonable execution of SW

CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

Nexus was shown to defendant’s cell phone because the affidavit in support of the search warrant for the phone showed that the gang had used cell phones to communicate and defendant was using his phone when arrested and he’d already … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to cell phones shown through investigation plus def was using his when arrested

ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station

ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station by Rashida Richardson, New York Civil Liberties Union & Jay Stanley, Senior Policy Analyst, ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ACLU: TSA Tests See-Through Scanners on Public in New York’s Penn Station

NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

“Based on our in camera review of the transcript of the Darden hearing, we are satisfied that County Court properly determined that the CIs existed and provided reliable and timely information that justified a finding that probable cause existed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY3: In camera CI reliability hearing established it

CA5: Def’s cell phone apps scan at border was supported by PC

“After discovering kilos of meth in the suitcase Maria Isabel Molina-Isidoro was carrying across the border, customs agents looked at a couple of apps on her cell phone. Molina argues that the evidence found during this warrantless search of her … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s cell phone apps scan at border was supported by PC

W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified and suppressed

The protective sweep here was unreasonable because the officers had no articulable facts at all that there was potentially anyone inside before entering. United States v. Rucker, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33607 (W.D. N.Y. Mar. 1, 2018). “Mr. Huffman had … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified and suppressed