CA6: Ptf inmate’s bodily privacy not unreasonably violated because female guard saw him in shower

Summary judgment was properly granted against plaintiff’s prison Fourth Amendment claim that his privacy rights were violated because a female guard happened to see him in the shower. He has a limited reasonable expectation of privacy in his bodily privacy but it doesn’t go that far. Sublett v. Brown, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 5576 (6th Cir. Mar. 5, 2018).

Discovery to try to overcome a Playpen warrant is denied because defendant can’t prevail. United States v. Harney, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34081 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 1, 2018).*

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel failed to properly argue the suppression motion is denied: This was thoroughly explored at the suppression hearing, and the video evidence supported the probable cause finding. State v. Henry, 2018-Ohio-787, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 826 (7th Dist. Mar. 5, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.