Author Archives: Hall

NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible

“Sufficient credible evidence supported the trial court’s determination that defendant was given an adequate opportunity to present the vehicle’s registration before the search commenced. When a driver is unwilling or unable to present proof of a vehicle’s ownership, a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible

N.D.Ohio: Email SW completely lacked PC, then there were false statements and material omissions, too

The motion to suppress the search warrant for defendant’s emails is granted. “Nothing in the 2013 affidavit used to obtain the search warrant approaches probable cause.” And, “Therefore, the 2013 search warrant affidavit is so lacking in indicia of probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Email SW completely lacked PC, then there were false statements and material omissions, too

MD: Surreptitious recording of def’s statement on cell phone violated state wiretap act

A parent’s surreptitious recording of defendant on cell phone for use to make a sex offense against him was inadmissible under the state wiretap act. Holmes v. State, 2018 Md. App. LEXIS 310 (Apr. 6, 2018).* First paragraph:

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on MD: Surreptitious recording of def’s statement on cell phone violated state wiretap act

OR: State’s inventory argument wasn’t presented during the suppression hearing, so it’s waived

The state’s inventory argument was not presented during the suppression hearing, and it can’t rely on that argument on appeal. State v. Steele, 290 Ore. App. 675, 2018 Ore. App. LEXIS 41 (Mar. 7, 2018). By letting the CI into … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on OR: State’s inventory argument wasn’t presented during the suppression hearing, so it’s waived

CA8: Stop of car apparently leaving scene of crime was valid

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop based on the fact the vehicle matched the description of one leaving the scene of a robbery by time and proximity, too. United States v. Daniel, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8504 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop of car apparently leaving scene of crime was valid

S.D.Ohio: This SW affidavit was adequate and different than co-def’s SW affidavit where it was suppressed

The affidavit for the search warrant as to this defendant adequately demonstrated probable cause. The fact the codefendant’s search warrant lacked probable cause isn’t binding on this search warrant. United States v. Damondo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57204 (S.D. Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: This SW affidavit was adequate and different than co-def’s SW affidavit where it was suppressed

D.Minn.: Statement is suppressed, but def’s giving up passcode to cell phone is not

While defendant’s statement is suppressed, his giving up the passcode to his cell phone is not, so the search of the cell phone was by consent. United States v. Jackson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55965 (D. Minn. Feb. 27, 2018):

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Statement is suppressed, but def’s giving up passcode to cell phone is not

MI: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in child protective proceedings

The exclusionary rule does not apply in child protective proceedings. In re Kirschner, 2018 Mich. App. LEXIS 1093 (Apr. 3, 2018):

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MI: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in child protective proceedings

D.Neb.: Def’s Franks IAC claim fails for lack of any allegations of fact

“Lloyd makes four claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Those claims border on the ridiculous.” As to his Fourth Amendment IAC claim for not making a Franks challenge, he alleges nothing was false. United States v. Lloyd, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def’s Franks IAC claim fails for lack of any allegations of fact

CA6: Decedent’s putting gun to head during execution of SW at his house justified deadly force against him

Officers executing a search warrant had the target pull a gun and put it to his head, so one shot him, and he died. There was a factual dispute about whether the officers properly knocked-and-announced before entry, but that’s not … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Decedent’s putting gun to head during execution of SW at his house justified deadly force against him

OH9: Running drug dog around car during computer check didn’t delay the stop

Running a drug dog around defendant’s car while the computer check is going on didn’t delay the stop. State v. Torres, 2018-Ohio-1173, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1274 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2018). The inclusion of a generalized along with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Running drug dog around car during computer check didn’t delay the stop

MN: Getting out of a car, looking at officer, then walking away was hardly RS

Defendant’s stop, handcuffing, and questioning was without reasonable suspicion based on his looking at officers and walking away. State v. Davis, 2018 Minn. App. LEXIS 162 (Apr. 2, 2018) (“he looked at me” or “he didn’t look at me” has … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Getting out of a car, looking at officer, then walking away was hardly RS

TX1: Search incident and inventory invalid for failing to signal; as to inventory, the inventorying officer is a necessary witness

A drug officer called a patrol officer to stop defendant. After he failed to promptly signal a turn, he was stopped, handcuffed, and his car was searched. “The search of Appellant’s vehicle incident to his arrest for failing to signal … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on TX1: Search incident and inventory invalid for failing to signal; as to inventory, the inventorying officer is a necessary witness

IL: Hospital employee seizing def’s clothing from private room at police request violated 4A

Police enlisting a hospital employee to enter defendant’s hospital room to take his clothing violated his reasonable expectation of privacy and made the employee a police agent. The seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. People v. Gill, 2018 IL App (3d) … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: Hospital employee seizing def’s clothing from private room at police request violated 4A

WaPo: Justice Department asks Supreme Court to moot Microsoft email case, citing new law

WaPo: Justice Department asks Supreme Court to moot Microsoft email case, citing new law by Ellen Nakashima: Now that Congress has made clear that a U.S. search warrant covers emails stored overseas, the Justice Department on Friday asked the Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice Department asks Supreme Court to moot Microsoft email case, citing new law

Motherboard: Mass Surveillance Memes Show Our Collective Anxiety Over Government Spying

Motherboard: Mass Surveillance Memes Show Our Collective Anxiety Over Government Spying by Mack DeGeurin: Surveillance memes are everywhere because it feels like surveillance is everywhere.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Motherboard: Mass Surveillance Memes Show Our Collective Anxiety Over Government Spying

NPR: Police Shootings Stir Outrage Among Some, But Not The Supreme Court

NPR: Police Shootings Stir Outrage Among Some, But Not The Supreme Court by Nina Totenburg: The U.S. Supreme Court has again stepped into the bitter public turmoil over police shootings of civilians, ruling Monday that an Arizona police officer is … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on NPR: Police Shootings Stir Outrage Among Some, But Not The Supreme Court

WSJ: Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance

WSJ: Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance by Shibani Mahtani and Zusha Elinson: CHICAGO—Several technology companies are working with police departments across the U.S. to develop the capability to add artificial intelligence to video surveillance and body cameras … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance

Volokh Conspiracy: The Supreme Court’s Continuing Immunity Crusade

Volokh Conspiracy: The Supreme Court’s Continuing Immunity Crusade by Will Baude A few thoughts on today’s summary reversal in Kisela v. Hughes.

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: The Supreme Court’s Continuing Immunity Crusade

MN: Typo adding wrong name into a DNA SW along with the correct name didn’t make it overbroad

“A [DNA] search warrant that mistakenly includes an incorrect person’s name does not lack sufficient particularity when the warrant provides a description of the correct person to be searched that includes the correct person’s name, date of birth, and location, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MN: Typo adding wrong name into a DNA SW along with the correct name didn’t make it overbroad