Author Archives: Hall

ACLU: Roadside Saliva Testing Is Probably Unconstitutional

ACLU: Roadside Saliva Testing Is Probably Unconstitutional by Chloé White

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on ACLU: Roadside Saliva Testing Is Probably Unconstitutional

S.D.N.Y.: Envelopes seen in plain view during arrest suggested drug proceeds and was valid plain view

Officers had an arrest warrant and took defendant into custody. A protective sweep was done and plain view observations were made, including cash in envelopes. The plain view, but without mention of the cash, was used to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Envelopes seen in plain view during arrest suggested drug proceeds and was valid plain view

D.Alas.: Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property in the search

The government got consent to search a package for drugs. That consent did not include cutting a candle in half to find the drugs. Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property. United States v. Swenton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Alas.: Consent to search doesn’t include destruction of property in the search

N.D.Ga.: No 4A requirement of a computer search protocol in the SW

This search warrant was for steroids and misbranded drugs and included computers and defendant’s home. The warrant was issued with probable cause and was as particular as possible. As to the computer search, there was no constitutional requirement for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No 4A requirement of a computer search protocol in the SW

ArkTimes.com TANF drug-testing program cost Arkansas $32,000 to test five people in 2017

ArkTimes.com TANF drug-testing program cost Arkansas $32,000 to test five people in 2017 by Benjamin Hardy (two tested positive):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ArkTimes.com TANF drug-testing program cost Arkansas $32,000 to test five people in 2017

NYTimes: In Fight Against Violent Crime, Justice Dept. Targets Low-Level Gun Offenders

NYTimes: In Fight Against Violent Crime, Justice Dept. Targets Low-Level Gun Offenders. In my district, through the end of March, 200 cases were filed. Normally, 100. Granted, there are many multi-defendant cases, but the AUSAs told me that they’re taking … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: In Fight Against Violent Crime, Justice Dept. Targets Low-Level Gun Offenders

CA10: A verbal judicial order to enter a house to take a child into custody is the equivalent of a warrant

A verbal judicial order to enter a house to take a child into custody is the equivalent of a warrant. Duran v. Muse, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 11481 (10th Cir. May 3, 2018). Motion to suppress was untimely and denied … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA10: A verbal judicial order to enter a house to take a child into custody is the equivalent of a warrant

D.N.M.: Protective sweep valid to look for other pressure cooker bombs; parent has presumptive apparent authority to consent to search of adult child’s room

Defendant was suspected of making a pressure cooker bomb, which was found. (1) A protective sweep was proper to determine whether there were others in the house. (2) The house was owned by defendant’s father, and defendant merely lived there. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Protective sweep valid to look for other pressure cooker bombs; parent has presumptive apparent authority to consent to search of adult child’s room

VI: In a traffic stop, def delayed in getting out and made furtive movements; officer asked “what do you have there?” Answer [“Just some weed.”] wasn’t 5A violation under Berkemer

Defendant was stopped for passing on a double solid line. The officer called out through the vehicle PA for him to get out of the car, but he first fished around moving things. When the officer got to the window, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on VI: In a traffic stop, def delayed in getting out and made furtive movements; officer asked “what do you have there?” Answer [“Just some weed.”] wasn’t 5A violation under Berkemer

Or: Officers didn’t violate def’s privacy by looking under bathroom stall door to see him masturbating

Officers did not violate defendant’s privacy rights in looking under the door from 5′ away to see that he was masturbating and ordering him out. The officers’ look violated no “social norms or [did it] significantly impair defendant’s interest in … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Or: Officers didn’t violate def’s privacy by looking under bathroom stall door to see him masturbating

E.D.Va.: Def could be seized under the SW for the business searched when he was found near the door heading in

The narcs timed execution of a search warrant for when defendant’s heroin dealer would arrive. He was near the front door when the police arrived, and he could be detained under Summers and Bailey. United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Def could be seized under the SW for the business searched when he was found near the door heading in

Business Insider: How to delete your DNA data from genetics companies like 23andMe and Ancestry

Business Insider: How to delete your DNA data from genetics companies like 23andMe and Ancestry by Erin Brodwin:

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Business Insider: How to delete your DNA data from genetics companies like 23andMe and Ancestry

NYTimes: N.S.A. Triples Collection of Data From U.S. Phone Companies

NYTimes: N.S.A. Triples Collection of Data From U.S. Phone Companies by Charlie Savage:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on NYTimes: N.S.A. Triples Collection of Data From U.S. Phone Companies

NYTimes: Drug Arrests at Immigration Checkpoint Violated Constitution, New Hampshire Court Finds

NYTimes: Drug Arrests at Immigration Checkpoint Violated Constitution, New Hampshire Court Finds by Ron Nixon:

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on NYTimes: Drug Arrests at Immigration Checkpoint Violated Constitution, New Hampshire Court Finds

CA4: It’s a reasonable inference that evidence of bank fraud will be found at home

It is a reasonable inference that records of bank fraud would be found in defendant’s home because it is usually kept for many years. The officer stated this in the affidavit for the search warrant as based on his experience, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: It’s a reasonable inference that evidence of bank fraud will be found at home

NY4: Oral motion to suppress denied; has to be written

An oral motion to suppress fails. It was required to be in writing for the record. People v. Hinojoso-Soto, 2018 NY Slip Op 03264, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195 (4th Dept. May 4, 2018). Driving a car at a … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY4: Oral motion to suppress denied; has to be written

E.D.Ky.: A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned

A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75738 (E.D. Ky. May 4, 2018). The police had a search warrant for animal fighting for the dogs and papers for … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned

D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge

Defendant had already filed a suppression motion and lost on good faith. Now he files a motion based on Franks that statements of witnesses in quote marks weren’t accurate. The previous finding of good faith carries over to here, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge

Because Facebook makes people dumb:

Defendant was linked to a carjacking. A search of his cell phone showed a video of him posted live to Facebook of him driving the victim’s car, wearing the victim’s watch, and counting the victim’s Cuban money. The video was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Because Facebook makes people dumb:

AR: The right to counsel applies at suppression hearings

The right to counsel applies at suppression hearings. Defendant’s attempted waiver was ineffective. Shabazz v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 281, 2018 Ark. App. LEXIS 298 (May 2, 2018). The officer writing the affidavit misstated the evidence that another officer smelled … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on AR: The right to counsel applies at suppression hearings