E.D.Va.: Def could be seized under the SW for the business searched when he was found near the door heading in

The narcs timed execution of a search warrant for when defendant’s heroin dealer would arrive. He was near the front door when the police arrived, and he could be detained under Summers and Bailey. United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75932 (E.D. Va. May 4, 2018).

Nothing was seized in the search warrant for defendant’s property that was used at his trial. Therefore, counsel couldn’t be ineffective for not challenging the probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. Fuentes, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75314 (W.D. Wash. May 4, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.