NY4: Oral motion to suppress denied; has to be written

An oral motion to suppress fails. It was required to be in writing for the record. People v. Hinojoso-Soto, 2018 NY Slip Op 03264, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195 (4th Dept. May 4, 2018).

Driving a car at a federal officer who was at defendant’s house to execute an arrest and search warrant was a federal crime. United States v. Wright, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74862 (D. Nev. May 3, 2018).

After defendant’s property was searched, he photographed the license number of one of the officers and then found out his home address. The government moved to use five text messages between him and another right after the search asking about the officer as evidence of an intent to conspire to intimidate the officer. Alone, they don’t mean anything, so the motion is denied. United States v. Archuleta, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75536 (D. N.M. May 4, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.