Author Archives: Hall

NC: On remand from Grady, realtime satellite based monitoring of a sex offender on release was unreasonable under 4A

On remand from Grady v. North Carolina, 135 S. Ct. 1368, 191 L. Ed. 2d 459 (2015), the state failed to prove that continuous realtime satellite based monitoring of defendant was unreasonable. The lack of a warrant requirement without any … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: On remand from Grady, realtime satellite based monitoring of a sex offender on release was unreasonable under 4A

N.D.Tex.: PV of short-barreled rifle and silencer was valid; incriminating nature immediately apparent

The incriminating nature of a short-barreled rifle and a homemade suppressor was immediately apparent for plain view purposes. United States v. Tidrow, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81807 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2018). “Prior to the stop of the vehicle, law … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: PV of short-barreled rifle and silencer was valid; incriminating nature immediately apparent

N.D.Ill.: No constitutional requirement that police car recording equipment be used

“Defendant objects to the magistrate judge’s probable cause determination asserting that ‘defendant believes’ that where a police car is equipped with video recording equipment the officer should be required to use it and that his testimony alone should not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No constitutional requirement that police car recording equipment be used

NC: Knock-and-talk at side door was unreasonable; the fact def’s friends and occasional buyers went to that door and not obvious front door isn’t an excuse

The police did a knock-and-talk and went to a side door. A knock-and-talk is limited to the door the public goes to. The fact an occasional visitor defendant knew well was permitted to go to another door doesn’t give the … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Knock-and-talk at side door was unreasonable; the fact def’s friends and occasional buyers went to that door and not obvious front door isn’t an excuse

E.D.Mich.: Def’s disclaiming ownership of cell phone when seized is a lack of standing, even when he claimed it after it rang

Defendant had no standing to challenge a search of a cell phone found in his car that he said belonged to his girlfriend. “Jackson does not deny that he disclaimed ownership of the phone at the time it was seized. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s disclaiming ownership of cell phone when seized is a lack of standing, even when he claimed it after it rang

N.D.Cal.: “Let me see ___” when defendant was seized is not consent

“Let me see ___” when defendant was seized is not consent. United States v. Rosette, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80985 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “Let me see ___” when defendant was seized is not consent

arstechnica: Forget scanning license plates; cops will soon ID you via your roof rack

arstechnica: Forget scanning license plates; cops will soon ID you via your roof rack by Cyrus Farivar” ELSAG LPR upgrade can ID “spare tire, bumper sticker, or a ride-sharing company decal.”

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on arstechnica: Forget scanning license plates; cops will soon ID you via your roof rack

IL: Direct appeal record isn’t adequate to determine IAC claim on failure to litigate consent search

The record doesn’t show the reason for waiving a Fourth Amendment claim against a consent search and whether a motion to suppress would have been granted if litigated. A collateral proceeding is the place to do it. People v. Williamson, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: Direct appeal record isn’t adequate to determine IAC claim on failure to litigate consent search

D.D.C.: Content of affidavit for SW suggests start of investigation predated Special Counsel’s appointment

The fact a 22-page affidavit for search warrant was signed before a USMJ ten days after the Special Counsel was appointed suggests that the investigation was going on long before that. The investigation is within the Special Counsel’s purview. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Content of affidavit for SW suggests start of investigation predated Special Counsel’s appointment

WV: Def can’t show abuse of discretion for trial court to not consider oral motion to suppress instead of a written one

Defendant can’t show an abuse of discretion from the trial judge’s declining to consider an oral motion to suppress. The rule says it’s in the discretion of the trial court. State v. Gaiser, 2018 W. Va. LEXIS 370 (May 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on WV: Def can’t show abuse of discretion for trial court to not consider oral motion to suppress instead of a written one

M.D.Tenn.: SW affidavit didn’t sufficiently show nexus, but not so lacking that GFE didn’t apply

The affidavit for the search warrant here failed to show nexus to defendant’s house under Sixth Circuit precedent. It was sufficient, however, for the good faith exception to apply because the affidavit was not so lacking in information that reliance … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: SW affidavit didn’t sufficiently show nexus, but not so lacking that GFE didn’t apply

ZDNet: US cell carriers are selling access to your real-time phone location data

ZDNet: US cell carriers are selling access to your real-time phone location data by Zack Whittaker: LocationSmart, a California-based technology company, is one of a handful of so-called data aggregators. It claimed to have ‘direct connections’ to cell carrier networks … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on ZDNet: US cell carriers are selling access to your real-time phone location data

CA9: Search of car could not be sustained as inventory since there was an admitted-evidence gathering motive

The inventory here was to conduct a criminal search of the car, and it is suppressed. Officers timed the arrest when defendant was in the car [allegedly] to minimize safety concerns. They admittedly were searching for criminal evidence, and not … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Search of car could not be sustained as inventory since there was an admitted-evidence gathering motive

E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

This defendant had no standing in the condo that was searched under a search warrant. He produced nothing to show that he had any connection to the property or was a guest with a connection to the premises, even an … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It

Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It by Jay Michaelson: President Trump’s addition to the Supreme Court sides with the bench’s ‘originalist’—and it has terrifying implications for your rights. Because privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It

SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

The driver of a rental car not listed on the contract may have a reasonable exception of privacy in the car Byrd v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2803 (May 14, 2018). Syllabus:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

Washington City Paper: Civil Rights and Activist Groups Sue Bowser Over Stop-and-Frisk Data Collection

Washington City Paper: Civil Rights and Activist Groups Sue Bowser Over Stop-and-Frisk Data Collection by Matt Cohen: ACLU-DC, Black Lives Matter D.C., and the Stop Police Terror Project D.C. want the mayor and MPD to comply with the two-year-old law.

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Washington City Paper: Civil Rights and Activist Groups Sue Bowser Over Stop-and-Frisk Data Collection

E.D.Mich.: No IAC where suppression motion wouldn’t be granted

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress cell phone records in 2014 because that motion would not be granted. United States v. Scott, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78666 (E.D. Mich. May 10, 2018).* The CI’s information was corroborated … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No IAC where suppression motion wouldn’t be granted

NPRL: Body Camera Maker Weighs Adding Facial Recognition Technology

NPRL: Body Camera Maker Weighs Adding Facial Recognition Technology by Ian Wren: The largest supplier of law enforcement body cameras in the U.S. is exploring pairing its cameras with new AI capabilities — including real-time face recognition.

Posted in Body cameras, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPRL: Body Camera Maker Weighs Adding Facial Recognition Technology

E.D.Mich.: Motion to suppress cell phone SW1 led to issuance of SW2, and SW2 was legally sufficient

Defendant’s cell phone was properly seized incident to his arrest. It was later searched with “search warrant 1.” When the defense filed a motion to suppress, the government got “search warrant 2” which was legally sufficient. United States v. Bailey, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Motion to suppress cell phone SW1 led to issuance of SW2, and SW2 was legally sufficient